Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ###
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 07:58:16 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v2i28o$1kiah$18@i2pn2.org>
References: <v18e32$1vbql$1@dont-email.me> <v1dtdv$3dqg4$1@dont-email.me>
 <v1du2i$3dt7u$1@dont-email.me> <v1fetd$3s7jo$1@dont-email.me>
 <v1ft42$3vdau$2@dont-email.me>
 <-5Gdnf-nQvstC6b7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
 <v1gid8$4ilc$1@dont-email.me> <v1h9eu$9faf$1@dont-email.me>
 <v1iqli$nsva$1@dont-email.me> <v1ln3c$vfh$1@news.muc.de>
 <v1s6e6$397iq$2@dont-email.me> <v1slmi$3cjtp$1@dont-email.me>
 <v1t8tt$3gu9t$3@dont-email.me> <v1vc8j$3jmr$1@dont-email.me>
 <v1vsru$7eqc$1@dont-email.me> <v21r4i$otc2$2@dont-email.me>
 <v22k4b$umr4$1@dont-email.me> <v24oah$1h4u3$1@dont-email.me>
 <v256fc$1kais$1@dont-email.me> <v27d05$25ga0$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2838r$29rd7$1@dont-email.me> <v2a8th$2ps09$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2ahqc$2qvr9$1@dont-email.me> <v2cb5s$39fvg$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2crk0$3cifp$1@dont-email.me> <v2cvuo$3dfkm$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2d0qm$3ddo5$3@dont-email.me> <v2f15t$3t14c$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2g2t6$3ugq$3@dont-email.me> <v2h95k$ecbj$2@dont-email.me>
 <v2ha1u$ehmg$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 11:58:16 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1722705"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <v2ha1u$ehmg$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2935
Lines: 27

On 5/21/24 1:05 AM, olcott wrote:
> On 5/20/2024 11:49 PM, immibis wrote:
>> On 20/05/24 19:56, olcott wrote:
>>> For two or three years everyone has been claiming that the
>>> above measures of correct simulation are incorrect. Their
>>> "ultimate" measure of a "correct" simulation is that D does
>>> whatever they expect D to do.
>>
>> The ultimate measure of a correct simulation is that the simulation 
>> does the same thing the thing that you are simulating does. In other 
>> words, H(D,D) does the same thing that D(D) does.
>>
>> When I test an electronic circuit in a circuit simulator and then 
>> build it in real life, it should do the same thing that the simulator 
>> said it would do.
> 
> *Lying meets the standard of losing defamation cases*
> You are a liar to the extent of losing a defamation
> case against you. The authorities can hunt you down
> by your IP address.
> 
> 
> 

No, YOU Peter Olcott is the reckless liar that doesn't care about the 
truth and thus might make himself guilty of defamation.