Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!xmission!nnrp.xmission!.POSTED.shell.xmission.com!not-for-mail
From: gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
Newsgroups: comp.theory,comp.lang.c
Subject: Thought control??? (Was: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ###)
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 17:16:32 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: The official candy of the new Millennium
Message-ID: <v2iktg$18lc8$1@news.xmission.com>
References: <v18e32$1vbql$1@dont-email.me> <v2hpv5$hfkg$3@dont-email.me> <v2ifo9$lhu7$2@dont-email.me> <v2ih2b$lqek$2@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 17:16:32 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.xmission.com; posting-host="shell.xmission.com:166.70.8.4";
	logging-data="1332616"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@xmission.com"
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack)
Bytes: 2396
Lines: 26

In article <v2ih2b$lqek$2@dont-email.me>, immibis  <news@immibis.com> wrote:
>On 21/05/24 17:48, James Kuyper wrote:
>> It also doesn't apply outside the legal system. If you actually
>> witnessed a crime, you're not required to pretend that the perpetrator
>> is innocent, and if you've witnessed something exonerating, you're not
>> required to accept the decision of a court that incorrectly found
>> someone guilty.
>
>In Germany you may be required to. Implying that someone committed a 
>crime which a court found them innocent of may be considered defamation 
>or insult.

I think you are beginning to get why it is a bad idea to be discussing
legal issues on an international forum like this one.  It all depends on
jurisdiction.  So, anyone who makes sweeping statements like "Innocent
until proven guilty" is making a bad assumption that all jurisdictions are
the same - the same as the one(s) with which the speaker is familiar.

Also, even in Germany, they can't control people's thoughts.  You are
still not required to *accept* trial court results.  You can think what you
want; you just (apparently) can't talk about it.

-- 
The randomly chosen signature file that would have appeared here is more than 4
lines long.  As such, it violates one or more Usenet RFCs.  In order to remain
in compliance with said RFCs, the actual sig can be found at the following URL:
	http://user.xmission.com/~gazelle/Sigs/LadyChatterley