Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ###
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 21:46:39 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v2jipv$1no6v$5@i2pn2.org>
References: <v18e32$1vbql$1@dont-email.me> <v1fetd$3s7jo$1@dont-email.me>
 <v1ft42$3vdau$2@dont-email.me>
 <-5Gdnf-nQvstC6b7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
 <v1gid8$4ilc$1@dont-email.me> <v1h9eu$9faf$1@dont-email.me>
 <v1iqli$nsva$1@dont-email.me> <v1ln3c$vfh$1@news.muc.de>
 <v1s6e6$397iq$2@dont-email.me> <v1slmi$3cjtp$1@dont-email.me>
 <v1t8tt$3gu9t$3@dont-email.me> <v1vc8j$3jmr$1@dont-email.me>
 <v1vsru$7eqc$1@dont-email.me> <v21r4i$otc2$2@dont-email.me>
 <v22k4b$umr4$1@dont-email.me> <v24oah$1h4u3$1@dont-email.me>
 <v256fc$1kais$1@dont-email.me> <v27d05$25ga0$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2838r$29rd7$1@dont-email.me> <v2a8th$2ps09$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2ag75$2r74q$1@dont-email.me>
 <66495b78$0$2422110$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
 <v2br8f$36n5f$2@dont-email.me> <v2cq45$1g2n9$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v2dl1i$3hgkg$3@dont-email.me> <v2f4ds$3tj41$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2fe1h$3vicu$1@dont-email.me> <v2h904$ecbj$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2hpv5$hfkg$3@dont-email.me> <v2ifo9$lhu7$2@dont-email.me>
 <v2ih2b$lqek$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 01:46:39 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1827039"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
In-Reply-To: <v2ih2b$lqek$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3147
Lines: 25

On 5/21/24 12:10 PM, immibis wrote:
> On 21/05/24 17:48, James Kuyper wrote:
>> It also doesn't apply outside the legal system. If you actually
>> witnessed a crime, you're not required to pretend that the perpetrator
>> is innocent, and if you've witnessed something exonerating, you're not
>> required to accept the decision of a court that incorrectly found
>> someone guilty.
> 
> In Germany you may be required to. Implying that someone committed a 
> crime which a court found them innocent of may be considered defamation 
> or insult. Germany has a strict lack of free speech, and can punish you 
> for insulting someone even if nobody else heard the insult (if they can 
> prove it in court). Luckily, this is still dependent on the person being 
> insulted choosing to press charges.

But the story is apparently that the charges were DROPPED, not that he 
was found innocent.

> 
>> When making decisions that are not related to punishing
>> someone legally, such as whether or not you want to invite an accused
>> murderer to dinner, you're entitled to rely upon the preponderance of
>> the evidence you're aware of - you don't need to wait for the legal
>> system to make it's decision on the matter.
>