Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Alternative compilation model for C
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 05:56:10 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <v2mlpq$1kbn7$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v2gaak$5al0$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 07:56:10 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a8a737fc9dd5c52bce5f2387b69f20c2";
	logging-data="1715943"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+NLV6H4/Es2dRo3rocBbdU"
User-Agent: Pan/0.155 (Kherson; fc5a80b8)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VnZ0EFom+iFaG2COvQQAhHJcWdE=
Bytes: 1267

On Mon, 20 May 2024 17:03:33 -0300, Thiago Adams wrote:

> So one difference of this compilation model is that #include is NOT text
> inclusion. It is "import symbols" and the external context is not
> accessible.

Reinventing modules à la Ada or Modula-2, anyone? Or even Mesa from Xerox 
PARC, even earlier?