Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?= <hugybear@gmx.net>
Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: What evfect will 5G have on 4G?
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 08:27:13 +0200
Organization: Camembert Normand au Lait Cru
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <v2mnk1$1khdm$2@dont-email.me>
References: <okit4jlclsd1m6houcimn77m66kfvth7qc@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 08:27:13 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="16b644e0f8357c16d1c9e3672ab338e6";
	logging-data="1721782"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/mqEmb7MRx1kUIycbVqI1JmuTGuR3AfL8="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:115.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/115.11.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2oq+62x57CXRcwf1NnUCU7G0Eq0=
Content-Language: de-CH
In-Reply-To: <okit4jlclsd1m6houcimn77m66kfvth7qc@4ax.com>
Bytes: 1683

Am 23.05.24 um 06:51 schrieb micky:
> 
> Since 5G cells are smaller than prior cells, 4G and earlier, when 5G is
> well-established, won't they still have to keep 4G to reach into the
> unpopulated woods, mountains, and deserts as far as cellular signals go
> now?

G4 is here to stay.

> Surely they don't plan to build even more 5G cell towers in unpopoulated
> areas where it hasn't been worth it to build a smallar number of 4G
> towers.

???

-- 
"Gutta cavat lapidem." (Ovid)