Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Good hash for pointers
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 00:43:59 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <v2okbv$1vp4n$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v2n88p$1nlcc$1@dont-email.me> <86v834i1o9.fsf@linuxsc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 01:43:59 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="438aee3945dcdba991233edefd290899";
	logging-data="2090135"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18SMszZ/j5YsPFpwhkMlQMGcHxEf2UycQ0="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:57xEwrKUsq149PdBOy//IJMPXSM=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <86v834i1o9.fsf@linuxsc.com>
Bytes: 1473

On 23/05/2024 23:49, Tim Rentsch wrote:
> Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> writes:
> 
>> What is a good hash function for pointers to use in portable
>> ANSI C?
> 
> I have a preliminary question.  Do you really mean ANSI C, or
> is C99 acceptable?
 >
C89 is better.
But the pass has been sold.
-- 
Check out Basic Algorithms and my other books:
https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/bgy1mm