Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v2q32c$2b3fj$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in
 recursive simulation?
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 08:01:00 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <v2q32c$2b3fj$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v2ns85$1rd65$1@dont-email.me>
 <cone.1716501172.972762.219193.1004@monster.email-scan.com>
 <v2oeuu$1urqv$1@dont-email.me>
 <cone.1716513008.662818.236297.1004@monster.email-scan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 15:01:00 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="853a48eea7a3e841565c364baea8e5bf";
	logging-data="2461171"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Xfukx2x/PbiwbaoJ5D+wt"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:7E69IVAclscnnPa1IIMb5LQL+yg=
In-Reply-To: <cone.1716513008.662818.236297.1004@monster.email-scan.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2466

On 5/23/2024 8:10 PM, Sam wrote:
> olcott writes:
> 
>>>
>>> This is the worst chunk of code I've seen in at least fifteen years. 
>>> It shows a complete lack of understanding of fundamental principles 
>>> of C and C++.
>>>
>>
>> It is the computer science of the Peter Linz halting
>> problem proof translated into C. This too is a template:
> 
> It's completely wrong. It suffers from a fundamental flaw of using an 
> inverse logical loop that makes its boolean logic produce an irrational 
> identity matrix.
> 
> The shown code is worthless. It'll never work. Try again, from step 1. 
> Start with the K&R book, beginning with Chapter 1.
> 
>> Can we please get back to the C or do you really want
>> to stay off topic?
> 
> As I already explained, it's syntactically invalid C, that no 

It is not syntactically invalid C, why lie about this?

Revelation 21:8  KJV)
....and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which
burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

> self-respecting C compiler will accept as well-formed code.
> 

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer