Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v2q32c$2b3fj$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 08:01:00 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 37 Message-ID: <v2q32c$2b3fj$1@dont-email.me> References: <v2ns85$1rd65$1@dont-email.me> <cone.1716501172.972762.219193.1004@monster.email-scan.com> <v2oeuu$1urqv$1@dont-email.me> <cone.1716513008.662818.236297.1004@monster.email-scan.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 15:01:00 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="853a48eea7a3e841565c364baea8e5bf"; logging-data="2461171"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Xfukx2x/PbiwbaoJ5D+wt" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:7E69IVAclscnnPa1IIMb5LQL+yg= In-Reply-To: <cone.1716513008.662818.236297.1004@monster.email-scan.com> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2466 On 5/23/2024 8:10 PM, Sam wrote: > olcott writes: > >>> >>> This is the worst chunk of code I've seen in at least fifteen years. >>> It shows a complete lack of understanding of fundamental principles >>> of C and C++. >>> >> >> It is the computer science of the Peter Linz halting >> problem proof translated into C. This too is a template: > > It's completely wrong. It suffers from a fundamental flaw of using an > inverse logical loop that makes its boolean logic produce an irrational > identity matrix. > > The shown code is worthless. It'll never work. Try again, from step 1. > Start with the K&R book, beginning with Chapter 1. > >> Can we please get back to the C or do you really want >> to stay off topic? > > As I already explained, it's syntactically invalid C, that no It is not syntactically invalid C, why lie about this? Revelation 21:8 KJV) ....and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death. > self-respecting C compiler will accept as well-formed code. > -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer