Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: How will the police find me.
Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 13:22:34 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 63
Message-ID: <v2somq$2svih$1@dont-email.me>
References: <9r9l4j1dauquc3vrg6bghhp6cerpsq01a9@4ax.com>
 <v2eaoe$3p5bi$1@dont-email.me>
 <0ckl4jl3efgequrtb68ed09gmrenl0q8bv@4ax.com>
 <v2g5b1$4h19$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2ga5f$5b0i$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2gfnm$2f5k$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <eh4t4jhh4gaj3pittannlqeseb3l1c31ql@4ax.com>
 <v2m89s$2aer$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v2odhf$1uklq$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2ok8j$ma$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 15:22:35 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="25c7d14c5e03a546781bc8af5dc6464e";
	logging-data="3046993"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+4aG6cwCh3WfUZqi8BwJ10e8PsfslIxzU="
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3mHIx856eDaMexG3bCskFfQLpmU=
	sha1:wrez6nFtV6m4mBrkFgo0JJtd63s=
Bytes: 3488

Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote:
> Chris wrote on Thu, 23 May 2024 21:47:27 -0000 (UTC) :
> 
>>> Thanks for asking. It's only fools who don't question common myths.
>>> I'm a scientist. 
>> 
>> Not even close. 
> 
> Tell me a single fact I've ever stated that you can prove is wrong?

Thanks for confirming you don't know what a scientist is. HINT: it's not
about never being wrong. 

> HINT: You can't.

You mean other than the two times in the last month?. 1) you claimed ios
had no geofencing capability, 2) you claimed ios had 10x the zero days of
android. 

> Note: There's a difference between facts & assessments of those facts.
> 
> For example, this is a fact:
>  The US Census Bureau reports accident rates for every state in the US.
> 
> Assessment of that fact:
>  Those accident rate reports are accurate.

Based on what? How are you defining accuracy? Is it post hoc justification
because those numbers match your bias?

> Note the difference, Chris, between fact & assessment of fact.

I do. I doubt you do, however. 

> You'll never find my facts wrong. 

Apart from all the times I and others have. 

> What you might (rightfully) disagree with are my assessments of facts.

That as well. 

>> 
>>> My words below are written very clearly around facts.
>>> 
>>> I'm saying we covered this many times where the US Census Bureau has been
>>> publishing *ACCURATE* accident-rate statistics for all fifty (48 at the
>>> start) states since the 1920s, 
>> 
>> And stopped about 10 years ago as far as I can find. Can you share a link
>> which shows this accident data for the last 20-25 years?
>> and their data on accident rates for each
> 
> We can google for it since it was reported in this very newsgroup, Chris.
>  http://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.android

That's not the same as providing a link. Where's the source of your data.
Information without a verifiable source is just anecdote. The onus is on
you to show evidence of your "facts". No-one else's. 

If you can't or won't then your "facts" are baseless and can be summarily
dismissed.