Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v2sq2l$2t61k$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: [OT] German politician successfully prosecuted for telling the
 truth
Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 09:45:57 -0400
Organization: Ph'nglui Mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh Wgah'nagl Fhtagn.
Lines: 73
Message-ID: <v2sq2l$2t61k$3@dont-email.me>
References: <20240522125702.0000756a@example.com>
 <v2qqf5$2fc26$1@dont-email.me>
 <27mdnRWJm93PuMz7nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v2rimu$2n0qr$1@dont-email.me>
 <PLqcnZv4l5nb_8z7nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Reply-To: fredp1571@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 15:45:57 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2d7385a8a8d8abab23f5ff855412568d";
	logging-data="3053620"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+0UNx6m7Oy5Apm0or4UxGZ"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:f4taG0raiFirEzufcMw34/BFdWY=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <PLqcnZv4l5nb_8z7nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Bytes: 4439

On 5/25/24 12:00 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On May 24, 2024 at 7:34:05 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/24/2024 7:40 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>   On 5/24/2024 2:53 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>   In article <v2q9me$2ce49$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>   moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>   On 5/23/2024 10:53 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>   On May 23, 2024 at 7:29:19 PM PDT, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>   So, if you mean to defend against this "incitement of hatred"
>>>>>>>>>>   charge, you'll have to argue either that the very concept is
>>>>>>>>>>   unconstitutional
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>   Well, we're talking about Germany here not America, so 'unconstitutional'
>>>>>>>>>   isn't on the table, but yes, if this kind of law were to be passed here,
>>>>>>>>>   it would absolutely without question be unconstitutional.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>   or that there's no valid reason it applies here.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>   There's no valid reason it should apply anywhere.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   Yet "incitement to hate" is a thing you recognize and deplore. (Isn't
>>>>>>>>   it?)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   No.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Then I venture that you're purer than most. How do you characterize,
>>>>>>   e.g., a speech alleging that Jews drink the blood of infants? Isn't
>>>>>>   there a key difference to saying, e.g., Jews are Martians?
>>>>>
>>>>>   Cattle can be incited to action.
>>>>>
>>>>>   Humans are responsible for their own actions. You don't get to duck
>>>>>   responsibility for rioting or hating or whatever by claiming someone
>>>>>   incited you and you became a mindless automaton incapable of independent
>>>>>   thought or action.
>>>>>
>>>>>   If you're hating, it's because you chose to, not because someone incited
>>>>>   you.
>>>>
>>>>   This isn't about responsibility for an action, or even for hate.  It's
>>>>   about whether "incitement to hate" -- regardless of whether anyone's
>>>>   thus incited -- is a recognizable concept we can generally identify.
>>>   
>>>   No. As I said, people are responsible for their own actions. And 'hate'
>>>   isn't an action anyway. It's a thought or an emotion, two things the state
>>>   has no business regulating in the first place.
>>
>> What people do or feel is irrelevant.  The crime that'd be alleged by
>> "incitement to hate" is what you *tried* to have them do or feel.
> 
> Well, that would be the only crime in legal history where the attempt is
> punishable but actually completing the crime is not.
> 
> The legal dystopia you'd create if you were in charge is stupefying.
> 
> 


So what?  It's the law.  I don't care what it WOULD be... it's on the books.

You're supposed to be a lawyer.

-- 
"Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man’s mind." - OC 
Bible  25B.G.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ek8kap93bmk0q5w/D%20U%20N%20E%20Part%20II.jpg?dl=0

Gracie, age 6.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0es3xolxka455iw/BetterThingsToDo.jpg?dl=0