Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v2tk9i$31qgp$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach
 its, own line 06
Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 16:13:22 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 84
Message-ID: <v2tk9i$31qgp$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v2nsvh$1rd65$2@dont-email.me> <v2pg3r$27s2r$2@dont-email.me>
 <v2qhlc$2dpfr$5@dont-email.me> <v2qihn$1vblq$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v2qrnf$2fesr$3@dont-email.me> <v2qvar$1vblp$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v2r1dn$2ge4f$4@dont-email.me> <v2r3r0$2h2l7$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2r7cq$1vblq$10@i2pn2.org> <v2rpda$2nvot$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2smub$22aq1$1@i2pn2.org> <v2t8o0$2vna0$3@dont-email.me>
 <v2t9tj$22aq1$5@i2pn2.org> <v2tajd$2vna0$6@dont-email.me>
 <v2tdre$22aq1$7@i2pn2.org> <v2tfms$30u1r$3@dont-email.me>
 <v2tgv2$22aq0$2@i2pn2.org> <v2th6a$319s1$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2tjpr$22aq1$9@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 23:13:23 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="010db72b80f31f696ef17c51994f71bb";
	logging-data="3205657"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19DgRaKT33l9UaPDA5in6XO"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:gcgUbNC20YJR3qfNws1FhSersXs=
In-Reply-To: <v2tjpr$22aq1$9@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4751

On 5/25/2024 4:04 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 5/25/24 4:20 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 5/25/2024 3:16 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 5/25/24 3:55 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 5/25/2024 2:23 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 5/25/24 2:27 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> As soon as you first hit the strawman deception change-the-subject
>>>>>> fake rebuttal I pint this pout and erase everything else that you 
>>>>>> say.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Thread renamed to be 100% precisely accurate*
>>>>>> Any divergence from the subject of the thread gets boilerplate reply.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> In other words, you refuse to accept the meaning of your words, 
>>>>> admitting that you plan to change them.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <snip so that *Usenet Article Lookup* finds the whole message>
>>>> http://al.howardknight.net/
>>>>
>>>> Not at all. I simply utterly reject the dishonest dodge
>>>> of the strawman deception change-the-subject rebuttal.
>>>>
>>>> typedef int (*ptr)();  // ptr is pointer to int function in C
>>>> 00       int H(ptr p, ptr i);
>>>> 01       int D(ptr p)
>>>> 02       {
>>>> 03         int Halt_Status = H(p, p);
>>>> 04         if (Halt_Status)
>>>> 05           HERE: goto HERE;
>>>> 06         return Halt_Status;
>>>> 07       }
>>>> 08
>>>> 09       int main()
>>>> 10       {
>>>> 11         H(D,D);
>>>> 12         return 0;
>>>> 13       }
>>>>
>>>> The above template refers to an infinite set of H/D pairs where D is
>>>> correctly simulated by pure function H. This was done because many
>>>> reviewers used the shell game ploy to endlessly switch which H/D pair
>>>> was being referred to.
>>>>
>>>> *Correct Simulation Defined*
>>>>     This is provided because many reviewers had a different notion of
>>>>     correct simulation that diverges from this notion.
>>>>
>>>>     A simulator is an x86 emulator that correctly emulates at least one
>>>>     of the x86 instructions of D in the order specified by the x86
>>>>     instructions of D.
>>>>
>>>>     This may include correctly emulating the x86 instructions of H 
>>>> in the
>>>>     order specified by the x86 instructions of H thus calling H(D,D) in
>>>>     recursive simulation.
>>>>
>>>> *Execution Trace*
>>>> Line 11: main() invokes H(D,D); H(D,D) simulates lines 01, 02, and 
>>>> 03 of
>>>> D. This invokes H(D,D) again to repeat the process in endless recursive
>>>> simulation.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> In other words, you refuse to accept the meaning of your words, 
>>> admitting that you plan to change them.
>>>
>>
>> Not at all and you cannot show that I disagree with the above
>> words to the slightest trace of any degree what-so-ever.
>>
>> *Liar Liar Pants on fire? Will assume so until proven otherwise*
>>
> 
> A don't say that you disagree woth them, 

 >>> In other words, you refuse to accept the meaning of your words,
YES YOU DID, LOOK AT YOUR OWN WORDS ABOVE.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer