Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v2tl3c$31uo4$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach
 its, own line 06
Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 16:27:07 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 79
Message-ID: <v2tl3c$31uo4$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v2nsvh$1rd65$2@dont-email.me> <v2pg3r$27s2r$2@dont-email.me>
 <v2qhlc$2dpfr$5@dont-email.me> <v2qihn$1vblq$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v2qrnf$2fesr$3@dont-email.me> <v2qvar$1vblp$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v2r1dn$2ge4f$4@dont-email.me> <v2r3r0$2h2l7$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2r7cq$1vblq$10@i2pn2.org> <v2rpda$2nvot$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2smub$22aq1$1@i2pn2.org> <v2t8o0$2vna0$3@dont-email.me>
 <v2t9tj$22aq1$5@i2pn2.org> <v2tajd$2vna0$6@dont-email.me>
 <v2tdre$22aq1$7@i2pn2.org> <v2tfms$30u1r$3@dont-email.me>
 <v2tk27$dut$1@news.muc.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 23:27:09 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="010db72b80f31f696ef17c51994f71bb";
	logging-data="3209988"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/h1DVQ7By86PmxkFE+MsH1"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Z6BoRmhPKYCT0JVgyF8R4L4rPCg=
In-Reply-To: <v2tk27$dut$1@news.muc.de>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4441

On 5/25/2024 4:09 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> [ Followup-To: set ]
> 
> In comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> [ .... ]
> 
>> Not at all. I simply utterly reject the dishonest dodge
>> of the strawman deception change-the-subject rebuttal.
> 
>> typedef int (*ptr)();  // ptr is pointer to int function in C
>> 00       int H(ptr p, ptr i);
>> 01       int D(ptr p)
>> 02       {
>> 03         int Halt_Status = H(p, p);
>> 04         if (Halt_Status)
>> 05           HERE: goto HERE;
>> 06         return Halt_Status;
>> 07       }
>> 08
>> 09       int main()
>> 10       {
>> 11         H(D,D);
>> 12         return 0;
>> 13       }
> 
>> The above template refers to an infinite set of H/D pairs where D is
>> correctly simulated by pure function H. This was done because many
>> reviewers used the shell game ploy to endlessly switch which H/D pair
>> was being referred to.
> 
>> *Correct Simulation Defined*
>>     This is provided because many reviewers had a different notion of
>>     correct simulation that diverges from this notion.
> 
>>     A simulator is an x86 emulator that correctly emulates at least one
>>     of the x86 instructions of D in the order specified by the x86
>>     instructions of D.
> 
> Having simulated at least one x86 instruction, what does a correct
> simulator then do?  This isn't made clear.  I'm assuming it must return
> an integer, as its C specification says.
> 

D correctly simulated by pure function H means that H correctly emulates
1 to N of the machine language instructions of D with an x86 emulator
and this involves 0 to M recursive emulations of H emulating itself
emulating D.

Because H is a pure function we know that H halts and returns some
value. For simplicity we will say that this value is the meaningless 56.

>>     This may include correctly emulating the x86 instructions of H in the
>>     order specified by the x86 instructions of H thus calling H(D,D) in
>>     recursive simulation.
> 
>> *Execution Trace*
>> Line 11: main() invokes H(D,D); H(D,D) simulates lines 01, 02, and 03 of
>> D. This invokes H(D,D) again to repeat the process in endless recursive
>> simulation.
> 
> Not if the simulation is "correct"; suppose the simulation emulates just
> one instruction of D.  Supposing it then returns 0 (somewhat extending
> your definition of a "correct simulator").  The execution trace will then
> be somewhat different from what you've outlined above.
> 

I rephrased it to be more clear.
Thanks for your review.

>> -- 
>> Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
>> hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
> 

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer