Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: D correctly simulated by pure function H cannot possibly reach
 its, own line 06
Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 18:23:39 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 84
Message-ID: <v2trts$331vq$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v2nsvh$1rd65$2@dont-email.me> <v2pg3r$27s2r$2@dont-email.me>
 <v2qhlc$2dpfr$5@dont-email.me> <v2qihn$1vblq$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v2qrnf$2fesr$3@dont-email.me> <v2qvar$1vblp$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v2r1dn$2ge4f$4@dont-email.me> <v2r3r0$2h2l7$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2r7cq$1vblq$10@i2pn2.org> <v2rpda$2nvot$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2smub$22aq1$1@i2pn2.org> <v2t8o0$2vna0$3@dont-email.me>
 <v2t9tj$22aq1$5@i2pn2.org> <v2tajd$2vna0$6@dont-email.me>
 <v2tdre$22aq1$7@i2pn2.org> <v2tfms$30u1r$3@dont-email.me>
 <v2tgv2$22aq0$2@i2pn2.org> <v2th6a$319s1$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2tjpr$22aq1$9@i2pn2.org> <v2tk9i$31qgp$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2tkit$22aq0$6@i2pn2.org> <v2tl8b$31uo4$2@dont-email.me>
 <v2tm5d$22aq0$7@i2pn2.org> <v2tnr1$32e7p$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2tp5n$22aq0$9@i2pn2.org> <v2tpdg$32me8$2@dont-email.me>
 <v2tptp$22aq1$13@i2pn2.org> <v2tq50$32r0d$2@dont-email.me>
 <v2tqh7$22aq1$15@i2pn2.org> <v2tr68$32uto$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2trch$23vgp$1@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 01:23:40 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b67ec24a85de95a55e6b4d0cc81926c3";
	logging-data="3246074"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+RYP/oN6T3ha0P/b0gW/vC"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:vY73C0BsSrLQNhLQ99G4asLAZwA=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v2trch$23vgp$1@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 5089

On 5/25/2024 6:14 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 5/25/24 7:11 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 5/25/2024 5:59 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 5/25/24 6:53 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> *We can get to that ONLY WHEN WE HAVE THE ABOVE SUBJECT AS A BASIS*
>>>> *We can get to that ONLY WHEN WE HAVE THE ABOVE SUBJECT AS A BASIS*
>>>> *We can get to that ONLY WHEN WE HAVE THE ABOVE SUBJECT AS A BASIS*
>>>
>>> No we need to handle them to know what you have defined.
>>>
>>> After all, if we don't agree on the inmplications, we don't have 
>>> agreement on what is being stipuated as the defintions.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Thus trolling me is made impotent*
>>>> *Thus trolling me is made impotent*
>>>> *Thus trolling me is made impotent*
>>>>
>>>
>>> They are not "Baseless" but based on the actual definitions of the 
>>> terms that you are changing.
>>>
>>
>> *In other words you can show in a convincing way that this is false*
>> *In other words you can show in a convincing way that this is false*
>> *In other words you can show in a convincing way that this is false*
> 
> Didn't say that, which shows you to be a liar, or at least being 
> deceptive, which is why we need to handle the implications first
> 
> (Note, you are just proving that you don't understand how logic works)
> 
> 
> The implications of your specifications are:
> 
> 1) That your H is NOT a computation equivalent for a Turing machine.
> 

OFF TOPIC UNTIL AFTER WE HAVE THE BASIS OF THE SUBJECT LINE OF THIS POST

> 2) That you simulations do NOT say anything about the actual behavior of 
> the machine given on the input, especially about its halting status.
> 

OFF TOPIC UNTIL AFTER WE HAVE THE BASIS OF THE SUBJECT LINE OF THIS POST

> 3) That you "infinite set of H/D pairs" does NOT correspond to the 
> concept of the behavior of a machine, and
> 

OFF TOPIC UNTIL AFTER WE HAVE THE BASIS OF THE SUBJECT LINE OF THIS POST

> 4) That you D and H are NOT eqivalents of the corresponding things in 
> the Linz or Sipser proofs.
> 

OFF TOPIC UNTIL AFTER WE HAVE THE BASIS OF THE SUBJECT LINE OF THIS POST

*I ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY MORE DISHONEST DODGE*
*STRAW-MAN DECEPTION CHANGE-THE-SUBJECT FAKE REBUTTALS*

> 5) You are not interested in Honest Dialog, but are hoping someone will 
> agree to baddly defined terms so you can claim support for your lies.

*I ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY MORE DISHONEST DODGE*
*STRAW-MAN DECEPTION CHANGE-THE-SUBJECT FAKE REBUTTALS*

*I ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY MORE DISHONEST DODGE*
*STRAW-MAN DECEPTION CHANGE-THE-SUBJECT FAKE REBUTTALS*

*I ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY MORE DISHONEST DODGE*
*STRAW-MAN DECEPTION CHANGE-THE-SUBJECT FAKE REBUTTALS*

*I ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY MORE DISHONEST DODGE*
*STRAW-MAN DECEPTION CHANGE-THE-SUBJECT FAKE REBUTTALS*

*I ABSOLUTELY WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY MORE DISHONEST DODGE*
*STRAW-MAN DECEPTION CHANGE-THE-SUBJECT FAKE REBUTTALS*


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer