Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.mobile.android
Subject: Re: How will the police find me.
Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 10:03:18 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <v2v1d6$3c6d9$1@dont-email.me>
References: <9r9l4j1dauquc3vrg6bghhp6cerpsq01a9@4ax.com>
 <v2eaoe$3p5bi$1@dont-email.me>
 <0ckl4jl3efgequrtb68ed09gmrenl0q8bv@4ax.com>
 <v2g5b1$4h19$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2ga5f$5b0i$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2gfnm$2f5k$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <eh4t4jhh4gaj3pittannlqeseb3l1c31ql@4ax.com>
 <v2m89s$2aer$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v2odhf$1uklq$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2ok8j$ma$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
 <v2somq$2svih$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2ssbs$73b$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 12:03:18 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="25f97fc8b52fb1c0fd73e709b279feaa";
	logging-data="3545513"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18cVzX22EmEsJmbgXuId/u3SKvrq+pqZRo="
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:kLjRiT8AShfhAy3nrOlFR5yIt40=
	sha1:/3mhPyBK7L1SKUoBTsHtIJUr5ms=
Bytes: 3345

Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote:
> Chris wrote on Sat, 25 May 2024 13:22:34 -0000 (UTC) :

Silent snip noted. Arlen is clearly unhappy about being found out to be
wrong on multiple occasions. 

>>> Assessment of that fact:
>>> Those accident rate reports are accurate.
>> 
>> Based on what? How are you defining accuracy? Is it post hoc justification
>> because those numbers match your bias?
> 
> You're the one with the "bias" becsaue you quoted zero facts.

Also noted that you haven't answered the question. 

> Unlike you, I've said many times that I too would have believed the ignrant
> myth about cellphones & accident rates had I not checked the facts in the
> reliable records like any well-trained scientist should do,.
> 
> I know the facts.
> You are just guessing.

I haven't made any statements. 

> Hence, you're the one holding on to the myth without checking the facts.
> 
> People who are not ignorant & uneducated *have* looked at the myth though.
>  <https://digitalcommons.lib.uconn.edu/law_review/8/>
> 
> Look at the US Census Accident Rate statistics by year, for example.
>  <https://www.google.com/search?q=us+census+accident+rate+statistics+by+year>
> 
> What do you see, Chris?
>  <https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/2010/compendia/statab/130ed/tables/11s1102.pdf>

I see very old and patchy data. 

> Look at first-order effects, Chris... i.e., the accident rate per year.
>  <https://www.iihs.org/topics/fatality-statistics/detail/yearly-snapshot>
> 
> What do you see happening during the skyrocketing cellphone days, Chris?
>  <https://injuryfacts.nsc.org/motor-vehicle/historical-fatality-trends/deaths-and-rates/>
> 
> HINT: Accident rates trending down were wholly unaffected by cellphones.

Only one of those links is for accidents. The others are deaths, which
you've claimed for years are not meaningful.