Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.bofh.team!paganini.bofh.team!not-for-mail
From: Devan =?UTF-8?b?z4fPic+Bzr/Ous61zr3PhM+Bzr/OvM6tzr3Ovw==?= <sp@osvd.gr>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
Subject: Re: And the mumble of your idiot guru - still inconsistent
Followup-To: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math
Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 14:37:55 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: To protect and to server
Message-ID: <v2vhg3$1icfg$1@paganini.bofh.team>
References: <17d2d227785459c1$1973722$261710$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
	<v2tohm$1afdt$1@paganini.bofh.team>
	<17d2ee2495a963ae$1946029$253407$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 14:37:55 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: paganini.bofh.team; logging-data="1651184"; posting-host="88h+RVVfRnXzKM6YT4rwIA.user.paganini.bofh.team"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@bofh.team"; posting-account="9dIQLXBM7WM9KzA+yjdR4A";
User-Agent: Xnews/2006.08.05
X-Face: $"eO7q^g,@mN0klG2J]sV"NMbeVMf2'-;P*@(~`UkK_cA{lP/ixtb>t!n{xTQK<7
 PC})}3=9!ps)Wq/=wI'swo3![y6wN5"I`{Z7Jr`virT"6}OZN|Jn.q9`Drs(r8rOxq#ZCW'
 ,>|wg%J=BZ><Y<gC;4tucH~$4u9.x)k9Bt5Y*(fFz~1`]<3\F/V$AlnM6C9*EYL],~06R!0
 hgSe6ua)>}cm>>9'v>&)\!06qQ]dy5b;&V8u0UdmE]g-AL{a$50'0Z\|:Q,:xMB0$U';.lO
 C'e=%Lr/$6ZRDV<N@QX7QZfxK+*A$8rPS$lyNxb\b
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEVbMhna3OCp
 gmYdGRlXXWXDs6vCptXtAAACaUlEQVQ4jWVU0XLcIAzcMcoH0CnvjoLfmeAPoJz
 uPSbm/3+lK1/aJqnGd8NokZBWC5i0I0Z+nyzNCbpn/B844BFcfQXetoQ4GfcN+I
 Hng8D8yPawI8WYw8GIdKQrm5vXMeMAHIi+jukPwF0rhMDHXgJpmOk25xukx4R1O
 R571awaLRexLU6s6PQms1ulBUFtlu8OCBieW72soJbF7FeMBJpotvAAdn6i+uwA
 OgTwNB5RazZV5sabmApCLY+YgLZoZnH4aV2zNM9OQ4Vtk3UbkvWeIQ0l3OoNhU1
 sU5sh5q7atQHB6loCwDYzI+JJQBWA7BWFybxJBxJ58ABIDftraBATtYY4hKejBe
 y3UJ5uKmyqe0ReuhpQbF9R+stdhoWnzKpWr40JOhSyvS/LkLAMRbqB7ibWg67wO
 lZSyWoms7PG3pa2slTlGSHsXTEaiQW27CVAzro1K9yA4YOQIK1nNiPv95OVh9Ix
 xCPqoqEurcnLxjpupRjG3lBDYbKzNLVbZs0rc+B0zjlRIgE8JpPRfAF7cbo5qr0
 W1SWRnoXpcF7zIfPFggOR89+1ESgXQJFZDQuBQQZNDNkzluYtstGuMWnuRvbyPW
 W6qBSQyvZKgDYaxkFttmIOtBqeKEqq5KyXdlPjOHnK9lKpqEHtv1RsDpwclpoeP
 +rhQEzhAWwnyaGaKH7eCT0ie3AgnTlUxtBpcw7qkLxS63G+OY9Cx6D6XIDOhXGL
 i5Vn9GzX+BEugDr9uFSkz6gb/uyS6vH3NZgUml36I5Nf7nKcY5sP4z3/+ihckRf
 w/R25QHaU5vzsesTzD58ypSP9W/8GRFyt1g9IP8kAAAAASUVORK5CYII=
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.3
Bytes: 3486
Lines: 18

Maciej Wozniak wrote:

>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second As seen, the definition of second
>>> loved so much to be invoked by relativistic morons - wasn't valid in
>>> the time when their idiot guru lived and mumbled. Up to 1960 it was
>>> ordinary 1/86400 of a solar day, also in physics.
>> 
>> you dont undrestand. That second is based on a oscillation which is too
>> long. A smaller duration oscillation proves the longer wrong. That's
>> why the smaller is better.
> 
> Maybe it is; still -  the longer one was good enough for your idiot guru
> , and for the first generations of relativistic idiots as well - and
> that makes their mumble inconsistent.

that's imprecise, me frendo. A lot of scientist usenet users dont know 
that, ie in computers, timing is essential. Without a second you can trust, 
you fuck up the entire thing, not only the wrong Einstienian relativity. 
You couldnt post the crap you write, without a proper second.