Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v300on$3h7if$1@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v300on$3h7if$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Good hash for pointers
Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 19:58:31 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <v300on$3h7if$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v2n88p$1nlcc$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2qm8m$2el55$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <v2qnue$2evlu$1@dont-email.me> <v2r9br$2hva2$1@dont-email.me>
 <86fru6gsqr.fsf@linuxsc.com>
 <v2sudq$2trh1$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <8634q5hjsp.fsf@linuxsc.com> <v2t8od$2vpp7$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2tk9s$31qv4$1@dont-email.me> <v2tnfi$32d1i$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2tpg5$32o5a$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: nospam.harnden@invalid.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 20:58:32 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="635dc1a49adbb44310811cef02a919f7";
	logging-data="3710543"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Sej6uK+S/UEFac37t/Cg+DRFdovGoE1s="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ys5YrF1Lz4Ef4xvZzRyZHRswPKE=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <v2tpg5$32o5a$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 1831

On 25/05/2024 23:42, bart wrote:
> 
> It's not clear to me what the hashing is for on the nodes. What exactly 
> is the input being looked up, and what is being compared? Because 
> something sounds off: you don't normally look up a pointer to try and 
> find it in a table; you already have the pointer pointing at the data!

This.

Are you really hashing the pointer?