Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v30p8r$r3v2$1@solani.org>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v30p8r$r3v2$1@solani.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: What Made My Day Today? :-)
Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 20:56:43 -0500
Organization: Modern Human
Message-ID: <v30p8r$r3v2$1@solani.org>
References: <t5kd47$fp4c$1@solani.org> <tcv9ke$jem0$1@solani.org>
 <tdpflr$4am0$2@solani.org> <tegpcl$h60v$1@solani.org>
 <tf03hh$qgti$1@solani.org> <tg3eqa$8ea3$2@solani.org>
 <tkfbrn$k92l$1@solani.org> <ucd5n0$iut6$1@solani.org>
 <ucfqop$am2l$2@solani.org> <ucub28$i0lb$1@solani.org>
 <ucvidu$s3d5$1@solani.org> <ud1s8j$t5k6$1@solani.org>
 <uv17ne$av83$1@solani.org> <uv1q7c$a91m$1@solani.org>
 <uv1utu$ab30$2@solani.org> <uv9ajb$epr7$1@solani.org>
 <uv9b9d$f368$2@solani.org> <v0e7n4$7iv$5@solani.org>
 <v0e9lv$ac2$1@solani.org> <v0ea64$ac2$2@solani.org> <v0ed4o$ac2$4@solani.org>
 <v0ei59$e2a$1@solani.org> <v0je9j$31ta$2@solani.org>
 <v0m4j7$4djs$2@solani.org> <v0m5fq$4djs$3@solani.org>
 <v0sbbc$8442$1@solani.org> <v0tt8u$91t7$2@solani.org>
 <v0u2o1$8lj7$1@solani.org> <v0u7lj$3bjck$2@dont-email.me>
 <6632b34f$0$3711196$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v10nqo$tlf$5@dont-email.me>
 <6634d516$0$6438$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v1b8j1$3kv3$1@solani.org>
 <v2dfv1$gkjv$1@solani.org> <v309o5$q6o2$1@solani.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 01:56:43 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="888802"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0kX5bny4b31X1o8/82mMEfjUDJY=
X-User-ID: eJwNwokRACEIBLCWlm8PyxGU/kvwMgmjsD9n0GNiNug1NMlbBhNxZl9tV5uTB+p6ZCVdJe4UmlOrUHtj8H88QBU6
In-Reply-To: <v309o5$q6o2$1@solani.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 14102
Lines: 220

On 5/26/24 16:31, Physfitfreak wrote:
> 
> 
> Ok, ... The realities have begun to seep out in this strange struggle.
> 
> Looks like the incident with Iran's President and Foreign Minister has 
> been a calculated one. They had caused the failure in seizing the 
> opportunities offered by China to be part of their long-term future 
> supplier of oil. China preferred the independent Iran over Saudi Arabia, 
> but Raisi's administration proved to be unresponsive to China's efforts.
> 
> This was the biggest issue for this administration to deal with, because 
> Iran's decision-making structure itself is divided over such long-term 
> futures. About half of them, the traditional West-leaning thinkers (I'm 
> going to call them Conservatives although that's not how they're named 
> in Iran), think that Iran is safer with major relations with known and 
> well-studied culprit superpowers than with the new inexperienced China. 
> The other half, the risk-takers (I'll call them Progressives, again 
> despite they being called in Iran quite differently), think exactly the 
> opposite.
> 
> This administration began work _seemingly_ with the intention to satisfy 
> the Progressives and people backing them. That's how they won the 
> elections. All my folks in Iran, practically anyone I'm still in touch 
> with, had changed side for that and voted for Raisi's admin exactly for 
> the purpose of cutting ties with Nazis and Global Pests. But in action, 
> this admin proved they were serving the Conservative side in Iran. 
> Result is that China went to their second option, the Saudis, and began 
> creating that "Oil City" (or whatever they call it) with them, and 
> placed their remaining eggs as far as oil was concerned inside that 
> basket. This admin _let_ the chance go.
> 
> When the Progressives realized that the chance was gone, they got rid of 
> the culprits that had fooled them. Probably a tiny little bomb somewhere 
> inside the helicopter where the pilots were. Too little to cause 
> destruction of the helicopter, but enough to cause the pilots to lose 
> the controls for a few seconds.
> 
> Conservatives aren't and weren't that fool to have decided to act that 
> way regarding China's offer. Their logic is like, "Let's have Saudi 
> Arabia test China, not Iran." This has two important advantages of 
> course. It keeps Iran safe from unknown future behavior of China. And it 
> provides several steps for Saudi Arabia to walk into that new pathway, 
> _away_ from Nazis and Global Pests. So this type of thinking points to a 
> quite _regional_ way of seeing the future, not a way just for Iran. It 
> might be the correct view too. And they _did_ act according to that view 
> also.
> 
> But Progressives want to leave Nazis and Global Pests behind and 
> forever, with _any_ risk or even cost involved. They wanted to get what 
> China had offered to Iran.
> 
> China's need for oil is huge. Russia alone, which has sold even the 
> future 30 years of its oil to China, cannot and couldn't satisfy the 
> demand. China needed more, and Iranian Progressives wanted to get the 
> contracts for the remaining Chinese demands for oil. They did everything 
> for that, even changed sides and voted for such promises. But Raisis 
> team promised that and then slowly let it go to Saudis, not Iran. 
> Essentially doing exactly what the Conservative camp wanted.
> 
> But what good would a little bomb the size of a cigarette lighter do? It 
> looks, at first, to be doing nothing. But without doubt, it also talks 
> to the Conservative side. "You fool the Iranians, you die!"
> 
> So next time, for important Iranian issues, Conservatives will know in 
> advance that it would be their lives if they commit to such 
> Machiavellian methods and intrigues.
> 
> You can do that all the time to people in the USA and Europe, and get 
> away with them too. But in Iran, fooling people in such deceptive ways 
> costs your life.
> 
> That's what happened.
> 
> Note that neither deals with China, nor complete loss of such 
> opportunities, are totally over for Iran. In fact Iranians are now busy 
> to place their own men in there to push Iran towards increasing 
> relations with China. The big deal has now gone to Saudi Arabia, but the 
> rest of opportunities are there to jump on.
> 
> Nazis and Global Pests have always been better for the Conservatives in 
> Iran. This isn't anything new. They know each other very well. They have 
> decades and decades of experience in that. Both sides. Nothing is 
> totally unknown about them. But Iranians want more, cause they're not 
> happy. It doesn't provide enough for them. And as you see, they'll 
> literally kill you if you keep blocking them while saying otherwise.
> 
> 
> 


Ok, got time to add what I didn't get a chance to jot down.

It wasn't just the oil deal that was offered to Iran by China, and this 
admin gave it away to another nation in the region. There was also the 
Silk Road which was to cross Iran, but later were changed to 
Pakestan-Afghanestan-Russia route plan, again directly as a result of 
this admin's deliberate inaction allowing it to happen, while saying 
otherwise to Iranian people.

The two deals were major for Iran to have, but unfortunately also major 
for the nations in the region other than Iran to have, so they could 
take the first steps towards true independence from Nazis and Global Pests.

Now after what's done on both sides of Iranians involved in this, Iran's 
government-controlled media is trying to hide the facts about the 
helicopter crash using false arguments. They're saying the most likely 
reason was the downward mountain air drift, which sometimes happens. But 
the arrangement for the three helicopters in that formation easily shows 
this was not the cause.

Presidential helicopters in Iran are always flown according to a certain 
protocol. There are always three of them that follow each on the exact 
same path, keeping the same distance, with the middle one having the 
President inside; and the three helicopters have slightly different 
altitudes. The front one is flying higher than the middle one, and the 
third one is flying lower than the middle one. I don't know the reasons 
for that formation, but that's their protocol.

These differences in altitude and distance from each other are quite 
minor. If a downward drift in air itself had taken place, all three 
should've lost altitude when fog prevented them from visually detecting 
the descend, not just the middle one. In the case of that crash, they 
are saying only the middle helicopter encountered the downward drift, 
which obviously isn't sound reasoning. The pilot in the middle one was 
also the pilot telling the two other pilots what to do. He actually told 
both of them to immediately increase altitude so they could get above 
the clouds to gain visibility. The two other machines easily climbed 
above the clouds and the middle one, with the main pilot at the control, 
didn't make it and hit the mountain. Doesn't make sense.

So I think by all probability a small fire-causing bomb was placed in 
the pilot area of the middle helicopter, and were made to go off over 
mountainous area of the journey as soon as the other two helicopters 
could not visually see what was happening to the middle helicopter.

This was an insider job. People who joined this administration for the 
realization of goals they'd promissed to the public, and then had 
betrayed them. The bomb may've been placed there weeks back, or more, 
waiting for the opportunity. It isn't that long that China went to 
Saudis for the deal, and opted to the Pakestan-Afghanestan route to 
Russia, inadvertently bringing into open the present admin's actual 
intentions as opposed to what they were saying in the media about it. I 
myself followed that matter closely from day one when China offered 
them, and I didn't know Iran had done nothing about it until China 
changed to Saudis for oil, and to Pakestan-Afghanestan route for other 
goods. The true intentions of the new admin came out after Iran had lost 
both deals. And I think that's approximately when the bomb was planted.

The very root of the problem is this. The majority of Iranians, proven 
by the last election results, want to mind their own business and leave 
regional issues with Nazis to the regional countries themselves. The 
Conservative minority of course always have thought regionally and 
haven't missed the opportunities to fight Nazi and Global Pests vile and 
destructive influences in the entire region. They must've evaluated the 
benefits of Chinese deals for Iran alone, against that of the region 
when Saudis and Pakestan and Afghanestan, all three, get their chances 
to truly walk some steps away from Nazis and Global Pests' grip.

So all Iranians want the same thing. There's not a single Iranian inside 
and outside Iran left that has a favorable view of Nazis and Pests. But 
the Progressives want Iran cut all ties with Nazis first, while the 
========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========