Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v33etb$3scv5$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Do =?UTF-8?B?TWljcm9zb2Z04oCZcw==?= Copilot+ PCs Require Linux? Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 02:18:19 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 29 Message-ID: <v33etb$3scv5$3@dont-email.me> References: <qnbu4j1li5mgjm6gm0l5o3kvku94179t9u@4ax.com> <QNWdnbsVQuRa29L7nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@supernews.com> <66524006$0$1258327$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v2u28m$33nmn$13@dont-email.me> <6652ae90$0$7183$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v2uocg$3ajrn$4@dont-email.me> <66534360$0$6557$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v30g73$3lhel$4@dont-email.me> <lbi9f6Fhd3pU1@mid.individual.net> <v30t17$3k86l$4@dont-email.me> <lbinqpFj5p4U2@mid.individual.net> <v31bo3$3scv5$1@dont-email.me> <p7p95jtrpe11k2qajlhijg8is1rhtlasvk@4ax.com> <v33clr$ddl1$9@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 04:18:20 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="38c416623fa26a6a58d3ca8ee1dfae50"; logging-data="4076517"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+doOO4csf9ibvY1Y9TAGAn" User-Agent: Pan/0.158 (Avdiivka; 9555b5e; Linux-6.9.2) Cancel-Lock: sha1:F/7QOhUHwXjpPjV4FRcgZ7Uguls= X-Face: \}2`P"_@pS86<'EM:'b.Ml}8IuMK"pV"?FReF$'c.S%u9<Q#U*4QO)$l81M`{Q/n XL'`91kd%N::LG:=*\35JS0prp\VJN^<s"b#bff@fA7]5lJA.jn,x_d%Md$,{.EZ Bytes: 2557 On Tue, 28 May 2024 01:40:12 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <v33clr$ddl1$9@dont-email.me>: > On Mon, 27 May 2024 15:54:47 -0400, Joel wrote: > >> vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: >> >>> "Windows 11 Pro for Workstations 64". (I wonder what the "for >>> Workstations" gets you?) >> >> That edition of Windows has a more advanced file system than NTFS. > > You don’t mean ReFS, do you? I don’t think that’s available much any > more, > outside of maybe some legacy “Enterprise” installations. Certainly not > on any off-the-shelf retail machine. > > What else can Microsoft offer, besides NTFS? Nothing. I looked, and ReFS is in the feature matrix for the "for Workstations" Windows. I didn't see much else. Perhaps it's "tuned" with different registry settings, like the difference between "Home" and "Pro" editions. Meanwhile, Linux has no such fsckery... -- -v