Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v34tnf$lfph$1@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v34tnf$lfph$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_A_simulating_halt_decider_applied_to_the_The_Peter_?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?Linz_Turing_Machine_description_=E2=9F=A8=C4=A4=E2=9F=A9?=
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 10:37:18 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 75
Message-ID: <v34tnf$lfph$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v2nsvh$1rd65$2@dont-email.me> <v2vpt6$3g0m3$3@dont-email.me>
 <v2vqou$26570$5@i2pn2.org> <v2vrcl$3gakv$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2vslp$26570$6@i2pn2.org> <v301m6$3hcgb$1@dont-email.me>
 <v305j9$26571$1@i2pn2.org> <v30e5l$3lerc$1@dont-email.me>
 <v30fbr$26570$9@i2pn2.org> <v30hiq$3lv80$1@dont-email.me>
 <v30jb5$26571$2@i2pn2.org> <v30pr8$3r67p$1@dont-email.me>
 <v30rvv$3riij$1@dont-email.me> <v30t8u$26571$6@i2pn2.org>
 <v30u04$3rour$1@dont-email.me> <v30upc$26571$7@i2pn2.org>
 <v30vp3$3s4od$1@dont-email.me> <v321o0$28n58$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v3255k$2pkb$2@dont-email.me> <v326fd$28n59$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v327h8$3a17$1@dont-email.me> <v328l1$28n58$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v329t8$3mh0$2@dont-email.me> <v32ait$28n58$4@i2pn2.org>
 <v32bvc$48pj$1@dont-email.me> <v32cko$2937i$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v32nsa$6fo3$1@dont-email.me> <v32tfs$29dee$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v331mf$84p2$1@dont-email.me> <v332ci$29def$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v33790$8u5p$1@dont-email.me> <v337r0$29dee$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v33iqc$ebbg$1@dont-email.me> <v34fft$2bb65$1@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 17:37:20 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="62ab2bf33c274f123184493b42753dfc";
	logging-data="704305"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+U/3xj1CR3lPROle3UTjAk"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ni2EKgSQVAhFMUqr+F06hajkaXU=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v34fft$2bb65$1@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 4274

On 5/28/2024 6:34 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 5/27/24 11:24 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 5/27/2024 7:17 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>
>>> He STARTS with a proof that one specific (but arbitrary) machine gets 
>>> the wrong answer.
>>>
>>
>> *Not exactly, you are misreading this*
>>
>> The domain of this problem is to be taken as the set of all Turing
>> machines and all w; that is, we are looking for a single Turing machine
>> that, given the description of an arbitrary M and w, will predict
>> whether or not the computation of M applied to w will halt
> 
>   *** a single Turing Machine ***
> 
> not singular
> 
>>
>> ...
>>
>> Proof: We assume the contrary, namely that there exists an algorithm,
>> and consequently some Turing machine H, that solves the halting problem
>> https://www.liarparadox.org/Peter_Linz_HP_317-320.pdf
> 
>   *** some Turing Machine ***
> 
> Note singular
> 
>>
>> Ordinary existential quantification looks for at least one
>> element not exactly one element:
> 
> But you can look for at least one by looking for one without an 
> assumption that it is unique.
> 

The Peter Linz words refer to ordinary existential quantification
anchored in the infinite set of Turing machines.

∃H  ∈ Turing_Machines
∀x  ∈ Turing_Machines_Descriptions
∀y  ∈ Finite_Strings
such that H(x,y) = Halts(x,x)

>>
>> Does at least one Turing machine exist of the infinite set
>> of all Turing machines ...
> 
> Right, so if we can prove that none of them are correct, you have shown 
> that some is contradicted.
> 
>>
>> So like I have always said, the second ⊢* specifies
>> an infinite set of Turing machines.
>>
> 
> As a SPECIFICATION of the domain of selection, yes.
> 
> As a SPECIFICATION of what THIS ONE machine does, no.
> 

My formalization already handles this.

*Here is the same thing applied to H/D pairs*
∃H  ∈ C_Functions
∀D  ∈ x86_Machine_Code_of_C_Functions
such that H(D,D) = Halts(D,D)


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer