Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v36ce2$10n2k$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: D correctly simulated by H never halts
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 21:54:26 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <v36ce2$10n2k$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v2ns85$1rd65$1@dont-email.me> <v2s46t$2pj9q$2@dont-email.me>
 <v2ud85$396ga$1@dont-email.me> <v2v4r7$3chkl$2@dont-email.me>
 <v2vcud$3dtct$2@dont-email.me> <v2vhsr$3eilv$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2vl9s$3f6bi$1@dont-email.me> <v31hts$3uu5d$1@dont-email.me>
 <v323mi$29pd$3@dont-email.me> <v3474q$hf7u$1@dont-email.me>
 <v34omi$kj65$1@dont-email.me> <v35dpm$od8s$1@dont-email.me>
 <v35ksf$pk0n$1@dont-email.me> <v361qv$93c$1@news.gegeweb.eu>
 <v3634b$vg63$1@dont-email.me> <v36624$vrvg$1@dont-email.me>
 <v367en$100kd$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 06:54:27 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5e0f90a3b8af6dfd1735edf2e33f3d03";
	logging-data="1072212"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18D6Gum9s/ReVy7KlPdPLX950+YCwL7Btw="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:PbfqyxUc9Bdf/OVnJbnDIzZOtvE=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v367en$100kd$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2190

On 5/28/2024 8:29 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 5/28/2024 10:05 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
[...]
>> too vague? Oh that is rich.
> 
> I had to start specifying the x86 language because dozens of reviewers
> believed that D correctly simulated by H was supposed to report on the
> behavior of non-input: int main() { D(D); }
> 
> It was only that I could show that this would require simulating
> the x86 instructions of D incorrectly or in the wrong order that
> I could prove that they were wrong. Their mistake was my primary
> rebuttal for two years.
> 

How do you simulate cmpxchg8b?