Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.drwho,rec.arts.sf.fandom
Subject: Re: Doctor Who 73 yards review with spoilers
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 16:27:04 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 45
Message-ID: <v36hrr$11egk$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v2tc94$1an0$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 <622552986.738580438.596505.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
 <v34mj4$2f42$4@gallifrey.nk.ca> <xn0omd0ef8symfy000@post.eweka.nl>
 <v34q2k$2kcs$1@gallifrey.nk.ca> <xn0omd75d925k25002@post.eweka.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 08:27:07 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7d6406a1ac6f0de7024db7c2e70fb100";
	logging-data="1096212"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/mW1EwTCaQ+vO0GQI8MRHp5OLdjUKmgrc="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.18
Cancel-Lock: sha1:R3Chj3rcjdmv6NoY9aam+DZPmqQ=
In-Reply-To: <xn0omd75d925k25002@post.eweka.nl>
Bytes: 2625

Blueshirt wrote on 29/05/2024 4:28 am:
> The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <xn0omd0ef8symfy000@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> anim8rfsk  <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I’d give it an eight except for the ending which I’d give a
>>>>> zero.
>>>> 
>>>> 0 !!
>>>> 
>>>> average still below 5
>>> 
>>> Actually 'anim8rfsk' said that he'd give the ending zero... but
>>> eight for the rest of it.
>>> 
>>> I'm sure if we were rating Doctor Who episodes on their ending
>>> alone, "73 Yards" wouldn't have got above an average of 1!
>> 
>> Still
>> 
>> IMDB 8.4/10 from 3000+ participants.
> 
> One of your favourite rating sites isn't following the narrative I
> see.
> 
>> We must be quite the harsh critics.
> 
> Who's the 'we'? You are the one that submits algorithm reviews, and
> AI generated posts!
> 
> The rest of us review and rate episodes from our own perspectives.
> 
>> I predict a growing sour taste.
> 
> The 8.4/10 average rating on IMDB doesn't seem to represent much of a
> sour taste...

.... but, you watch, when that 8.4/10 slips to below 8 or, maybe, below 7
even, the asswipe could (rightly??) claim his 'prediction' was correct.

Small mercies!
-- 
Daniel