Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v385sa$1a8iq$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 16:14:50 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 80
Message-ID: <v385sa$1a8iq$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v3501h$lpnh$1@dont-email.me> <v362eu$2d367$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v363js$vg63$2@dont-email.me> <v36803$2d368$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v368je$100kd$3@dont-email.me> <v373mr$2d367$5@i2pn2.org>
 <v37bpa$15n0b$1@dont-email.me> <v37i9p$lls$1@news.muc.de>
 <87y17smqnq.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v37sap$18mfo$1@dont-email.me>
 <v382go$tjb$1@news.muc.de> <v3830l$19pmv$1@dont-email.me>
 <v384md$1a1c3$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 23:14:51 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b7a5feb561e035e50c2e5bc5a99a467f";
	logging-data="1385050"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/UmiVJTir/38lipZG4gxOn"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:O/JIGiRHVjTVDnCEe6R7YNVdF68=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v384md$1a1c3$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 4530

On 5/29/2024 3:54 PM, Python wrote:
> Le 29/05/2024 à 22:25, olcott a écrit :
>> On 5/29/2024 3:17 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>>> [ Followup-To: set ]
>>>
>>> In comp.theory olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> [ .... ]
>>>
>>>> When D is correctly simulated by H using an x86 emulator the only
>>>> way that the emulated D can reach its own emulated final state
>>>> at line 06 and halt is
>>>> (a) The x86 machine code of D is emulated incorrectly
>>>> (b) The x86 machine code of D is emulated in the wrong order
>>>
>>> That reminds me of a sketch from Morecombe and Wise (for non-Brits: this
>>> was a stand-up comdedy show from 1970s British television.  It was of
>>> extraordinarily high quality).  It was where Eric Morecombe was
>>> pretending to be a concert pianist playing Grieg's piano concerto under
>>> conductor André Previn.  As his limited pianistic capabilities became
>>> clear, on being accused of playing wrong notes, Eric replied, holding
>>> André threateningly by the lapels "I'm playing the right notes - maybe
>>> just not in the right order!".
>>>
>>
>> *Yet still no actual review of what I actually said*
> 
> Yet it is an accurate point about how your words are silly, pointless
> and ridiculous. On psychological point of view the fact you don't
> get that point is a clear sign of cognitive dissonance on your part.
> 

typedef int (*ptr)();  // ptr is pointer to int function in C
00       int H(ptr p, ptr i);
01       int D(ptr p)
02       {
03         int Halt_Status = H(p, p);
04         if (Halt_Status)
05           HERE: goto HERE;
06         return Halt_Status;
07       }
08
09       int main()
10       {
11         H(D,D);
12         return 0;
13       }

The above template refers to an infinite set of H/D pairs where D is
correctly simulated by either pure simulator H or pure function H. This
was done because many reviewers used the shell game ploy to endlessly
switch which H/D pair was being referred to.

H correctly simulates 1 to ∞ steps of D with either pure function H or
pure simulator H. In none of these cases does the correctly simulated D
ever reach its own simulated final state and halt.

*In actual finite memory C the H/D pair would eventually crash*

*Correct Simulation Defined*
    This is provided because many reviewers had a different notion of
    correct simulation that diverges from this notion.

    A simulator is an x86 emulator that correctly emulates 1 to N of the
    x86 instructions of D in the order specified by the x86 instructions
    of D. This may include M recursive emulations of H emulating itself
    emulating D.

*Fully operational code proves recursive emulation*

When we see that D correctly simulated by pure simulator H would remain
stuck in infinite recursive simulation then we also know that less than
an infinite number of steps is not enough steps for D correctly
simulated by pure function H to reach its own simulated final state at
line 06 and halt.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer