Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v39mt3$1lipm$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Do Microsoft?s Copilot+ PCs Require Linux?
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 07:11:31 -0400
Organization: None
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <v39mt3$1lipm$3@dont-email.me>
References: <9s645j1pehkhdkc7kjj3hbp2nnu93c4mfc@4ax.com>
 <66523fb2$0$1258345$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
 <v2u2cj$33vus$1@dont-email.me> <v2v9fr$3daer$4@dont-email.me>
 <v2vc53$3dkln$3@dont-email.me> <v30g0c$3lhel$3@dont-email.me>
 <slrnv5a4g0.8c8.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
 <v33c75$ddl1$4@dont-email.me>
 <slrnv5aeav.hse.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
 <v33tqh$ftv1$1@dont-email.me> <uglb5jho4cn959nosc8di0lai52p4tftb6@4ax.com>
 <v35pqb$qao6$4@dont-email.me> <tusc5jllfskdpj5cknsk84mb5p66q0b0hc@4ax.com>
 <v36f0o$111db$1@dont-email.me> <bPE5O.15788$ytC1.771@fx34.iad>
 <v37hpc$16hr0$5@dont-email.me> <W4L5O.2$B%H7.1@fx43.iad>
Reply-To: OFeem1987@teleworm.us
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 13:11:31 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3b13b446919fd3f0b1dcb7fa6636dba7";
	logging-data="1755958"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/9SopGuPiWtWf/jK+0m7je"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:dmC/MkuAqCBqgiwoR2PUrAvGnOc=
X-Mutt: The most widely-used MUA
X-Slrn: Why use anything else?
X-User-Agent: Microsoft Outl00k, Usenet K00k Editions
Bytes: 2459

Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> <snippage>
>
> Whether D'Oliveiro wants to admit it or not, Windows 2000 and XP both 
> looked like professional operating systems when they were released, and 
> they had a polished look which is often sorely lacking from Linux 
> desktop environments. Aside from Ubuntu which always manages to make 
> GNOME look great, the desktop environment of choice in most 
> distributions always has elements which simply don't look right. It's 
> still a fantastic environment which allows you to do every job you can 
> think of and more very effectively, but there is no reason to criticize 
> the way that any version of Windows has looked when the current crop of 
> Linux desktop environments don't look better at all.

Opinions are like assholes... everyone has one.

-- 
You will soon forget this.