Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v39qbm$1mbq3$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: A Bi-CMOS electronic photonic integrated circuit quantum light
 detector
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 14:12:33 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <v39qbm$1mbq3$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v390uq$ussj$1@solani.org> <v39nfm$1lsdr$1@dont-email.me>
 <v39oha$1m1ms$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 14:10:31 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="543b08e0981b4ab05cf5e78a984d4c97";
	logging-data="1781571"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+MUGX+j3FF4yfZq0e/1uMA"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YNavMvmdJX6tP+iKrQJGQCr2/DE=
In-Reply-To: <v39oha$1m1ms$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3054

On 5/30/24 13:39, Phil Hobbs wrote:
> Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> wrote:
>> On 5/30/24 06:56, Jan Panteltje wrote:
>>> World's smallest quantum light detector on a silicon chip
>>> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2024/05/240517164111.htm
>>> Source:
>>> University of Bristol
>>> Summary:
>>> Researchers have made an important breakthrough in scaling quantum
>>> technology by integrating the world's tiniest quantum light detector onto a silicon chip.
>>>
>>> Interesting is the circuit, figure 1 in
>>> https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adk6890
>>>
>>> the photo diodes dare used as pull-up and pull down to teh transistor base.
>>>
>>> Quantum talk everywhere,
>>> but interesting noise cancellation after the beam splitter.
>>> Anybody knows the basics of this?
>>
>> The very first word of their abstract has a spelling error. That
>> doesn't bode well for the rest.
>>
>> Anyway, it appears the quantum crowd is discovering the advantages
>> of synchronous detection, as has been used for ages in lock-in
>> amplifiers. They call it 'homodyne'. OK, fine.
>>
>> Jeroen Belleman
>>
>>
>>
> 
> “Quantum detector” means a device that detects light one carrier pair per
> time, such as a photodiode or phototube.  There are other sorts, e.g.
> microbolometers.
It was my understanding that all light detectors are quantum detectors,
even bolometers. It's very clear in superconducting edge detectors.

> 
> Homodyne detection is just a word for an interferometer with no frequency
> shift. No woo-woo stuff, apart from photodection itself, which is deeply
> mysterious when you really think about it.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Phil Hobbs
> 

I'm not really surprised that interactions between waves and matter
are quantized, but I'd love to find a classical argument to explain
the value of Planck's constant.

Jeroen Belleman