Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Do Microsoft?s Copilot+ PCs Require Linux?
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 10:54:39 -0400
Organization: None
Lines: 27
Message-ID: <v3a3vf$1nuke$2@dont-email.me>
References: <9s645j1pehkhdkc7kjj3hbp2nnu93c4mfc@4ax.com>
 <66523fb2$0$1258345$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
 <v2u2cj$33vus$1@dont-email.me> <v2v9fr$3daer$4@dont-email.me>
 <v2vc53$3dkln$3@dont-email.me> <v30g0c$3lhel$3@dont-email.me>
 <slrnv5a4g0.8c8.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
 <v33c75$ddl1$4@dont-email.me>
 <slrnv5aeav.hse.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
 <v33tqh$ftv1$1@dont-email.me> <uglb5jho4cn959nosc8di0lai52p4tftb6@4ax.com>
 <v35pqb$qao6$4@dont-email.me> <tusc5jllfskdpj5cknsk84mb5p66q0b0hc@4ax.com>
 <v36f0o$111db$1@dont-email.me> <bPE5O.15788$ytC1.771@fx34.iad>
 <v37hpc$16hr0$5@dont-email.me> <W4L5O.2$B%H7.1@fx43.iad>
 <v39mt3$1lipm$3@dont-email.me> <vA_5O.626$RsQ5.452@fx42.iad>
Reply-To: OFeem1987@teleworm.us
Injection-Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 16:54:39 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3b13b446919fd3f0b1dcb7fa6636dba7";
	logging-data="1833614"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19xUE/w54p+986GBWhzRMMC"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4dayA3osY6Yq6PS/PgdvGfhvi4M=
X-Slrn: Why use anything else?
X-Mutt: The most widely-used MUA
X-User-Agent: Microsoft Outl00k, Usenet K00k Editions
Bytes: 2872

Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> On 2024-05-30 7:11 a.m., Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>> Andrzej Matuch wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:
>> 
>>> <snippage>
>>>
>>> Whether D'Oliveiro wants to admit it or not, Windows 2000 and XP both
>>> looked like professional operating systems when they were released, and
>>> they had a polished look which is often sorely lacking from Linux
>>> desktop environments. Aside from Ubuntu which always manages to make
>>> GNOME look great, the desktop environment of choice in most
>>> distributions always has elements which simply don't look right. It's
>>> still a fantastic environment which allows you to do every job you can
>>> think of and more very effectively, but there is no reason to criticize
>>> the way that any version of Windows has looked when the current crop of
>>> Linux desktop environments don't look better at all.
>> 
>> Opinions are like assholes... everyone has one.
>
> What if you identify as asshole-challenged? I'm sure that's one of the 
> letters in the homosexual alphabet by now.

Then one would have a "cloaca".

-- 
You are a very redundant person, that's what kind of person you are.