Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise ---
 pinned down
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 17:08:11 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <v3dhob$2dio8$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v3501h$lpnh$1@dont-email.me> <v362eu$2d367$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v363js$vg63$2@dont-email.me> <v36803$2d368$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v368je$100kd$3@dont-email.me> <v373mr$2d367$5@i2pn2.org>
 <v37bpa$15n0b$1@dont-email.me> <v37i9p$lls$1@news.muc.de>
 <87y17smqnq.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v37sap$18mfo$1@dont-email.me>
 <v38eq4$2foi0$1@i2pn2.org> <v38fe0$1bndb$1@dont-email.me>
 <v38g31$2foi0$11@i2pn2.org> <v38gi5$1bndb$3@dont-email.me>
 <v38ici$2fohv$2@i2pn2.org> <v38j17$1c8ir$2@dont-email.me>
 <v38jgo$2foi0$14@i2pn2.org> <v38jv9$1c8ir$4@dont-email.me>
 <v39agi$1jiql$1@dont-email.me> <v39v3h$1mtd9$5@dont-email.me>
 <v3b9kj$2im02$1@i2pn2.org> <v3bale$222n5$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3bbs2$2im01$1@i2pn2.org> <v3bcre$22a8n$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3bduk$2im01$2@i2pn2.org> <v3bedb$22f8h$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3bfbm$2im01$3@i2pn2.org> <v3bg39$22o6m$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3cbhu$2k3ld$1@i2pn2.org> <v3clo2$28p7n$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3dft1$2lfup$1@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2024 00:08:12 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5617c6a52e82e3edb2307f1199229213";
	logging-data="2542344"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ZnVau7szJUE/szX9QiYep"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ErF1ob7p7Fcxmj5XayQ+ijJ90hw=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v3dft1$2lfup$1@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 3424

On 5/31/2024 4:36 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 5/31/24 10:10 AM, olcott wrote:
>> On 5/31/2024 6:16 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 5/30/24 11:27 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> Try and show how HH using an x86 emulator can correctly emulate
>>>> the following x86 machine code such that DD reaches its own
>>>> machine address 00001c47.
>>>
>>> Why should I, since that isn't what I was saying.
>>>
>>
>> *To me that looks like you know that*
>> *you have been busted in a lie and are backing down*
> 
> no, YOU are LYING RIGHT HERE AND NOW.
> 
> Prove that I said that the simulation by HH made it there, or admit to 
> being a DAMNED LIAR.
> 
> What I have been saying is the the DIRECT EXDCUTION of DD, and the 
> CORRECT (and complete) simulation of the input to HH by an actual UTM 
> will get there.
> 

That has always been the dishonest dodge strawman deception
CHANGE-THE-SUBJECT fake rebuttal regarding
the behavior of DD correctly simulated by pure function HH.

typedef int (*ptr)();  // ptr is pointer to int function in C
00       int HH(ptr p, ptr i);
01       int DD(ptr p)
02       {
03         int Halt_Status = HH(p, p);
04         if (Halt_Status)
05           HERE: goto HERE;
06         return Halt_Status;
07       }
08
09       int main()
10       {
11         HH(DD,DD);
12         return 0;
13       }

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer