| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v3do66$2ejq2$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise ---
pinned down
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 18:57:57 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 94
Message-ID: <v3do66$2ejq2$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v3501h$lpnh$1@dont-email.me> <v36803$2d368$3@i2pn2.org>
<v368je$100kd$3@dont-email.me> <v373mr$2d367$5@i2pn2.org>
<v37bpa$15n0b$1@dont-email.me> <v37i9p$lls$1@news.muc.de>
<87y17smqnq.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v37sap$18mfo$1@dont-email.me>
<v38eq4$2foi0$1@i2pn2.org> <v38fe0$1bndb$1@dont-email.me>
<v38g31$2foi0$11@i2pn2.org> <v38gi5$1bndb$3@dont-email.me>
<v38ici$2fohv$2@i2pn2.org> <v38j17$1c8ir$2@dont-email.me>
<v38jgo$2foi0$14@i2pn2.org> <v38jv9$1c8ir$4@dont-email.me>
<v39agi$1jiql$1@dont-email.me> <v39v3h$1mtd9$5@dont-email.me>
<v3b9kj$2im02$1@i2pn2.org> <v3bale$222n5$1@dont-email.me>
<v3bbs2$2im01$1@i2pn2.org> <v3bcre$22a8n$1@dont-email.me>
<v3bduk$2im01$2@i2pn2.org> <v3bedb$22f8h$1@dont-email.me>
<v3bfbm$2im01$3@i2pn2.org> <v3bg39$22o6m$1@dont-email.me>
<v3cbhu$2k3ld$1@i2pn2.org> <v3clo2$28p7n$1@dont-email.me>
<v3dft1$2lfup$1@i2pn2.org> <v3dhob$2dio8$1@dont-email.me>
<v3dk0d$2lfup$2@i2pn2.org> <v3dkf2$2e2po$1@dont-email.me>
<v3dmnc$2lfup$3@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2024 01:57:59 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5617c6a52e82e3edb2307f1199229213";
logging-data="2576194"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/loEx3DDnTr6b9Q6HrAUsd"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8mwfE2r0V8HHxbyfryxtrlzm7fU=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v3dmnc$2lfup$3@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 5333
On 5/31/2024 6:33 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 5/31/24 6:54 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 5/31/2024 5:46 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 5/31/24 6:08 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 5/31/2024 4:36 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 5/31/24 10:10 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/31/2024 6:16 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 5/30/24 11:27 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>> Try and show how HH using an x86 emulator can correctly emulate
>>>>>>>> the following x86 machine code such that DD reaches its own
>>>>>>>> machine address 00001c47.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why should I, since that isn't what I was saying.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *To me that looks like you know that*
>>>>>> *you have been busted in a lie and are backing down*
>>>>>
>>>>> no, YOU are LYING RIGHT HERE AND NOW.
>>>>>
>>>>> Prove that I said that the simulation by HH made it there, or admit
>>>>> to being a DAMNED LIAR.
>>>>>
>>>>> What I have been saying is the the DIRECT EXDCUTION of DD, and the
>>>>> CORRECT (and complete) simulation of the input to HH by an actual
>>>>> UTM will get there.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That has always been the dishonest dodge strawman deception
>>>> CHANGE-THE-SUBJECT fake rebuttal regarding
>>>> the behavior of DD correctly simulated by pure function HH.
>>>
>>> But it is your talking about the "correctly simulated by HH" that is
>>> the dishonest dodge,
>>
>> Try and show how HH using an x86 emulator can correctly emulate
>> the following x86 machine code such that DD reaches its own
>> machine address 00001c47.
>
> Never said it could. But haven't looked hard enough to be willing to say
> it can't, but then, who cares, it doesn't say a thing about the real
> halting problem, since H's simulation isn't "correct" by a definition
> that relates simulation to non-halting behavior,
>
"...the Turing machine will halt whenever it enters a final state."
Linz(1990:234)
*If DD correctly simulated by HH can't possibly reach its own*
*final state then DD correctly simulated by HH is non-halting*
*When we get as specific as the actual x86 machine code of*
*DD then all liars are exposed*
typedef int (*ptr)(); // ptr is pointer to int function in C
00 int HH(ptr p, ptr i);
01 int DD(ptr p)
02 {
03 int Halt_Status = HH(p, p);
04 if (Halt_Status)
05 HERE: goto HERE;
06 return Halt_Status;
07 }
08
09 int main()
10 {
11 HH(DD,DD);
12 return 0;
13 }
_DD()
[00001c22] 55 push ebp
[00001c23] 8bec mov ebp,esp
[00001c25] 51 push ecx
[00001c26] 8b4508 mov eax,[ebp+08]
[00001c29] 50 push eax ; push DD 1c22
[00001c2a] 8b4d08 mov ecx,[ebp+08]
[00001c2d] 51 push ecx ; push DD 1c22
[00001c2e] e80ff7ffff call 00001342 ; call HH
[00001c33] 83c408 add esp,+08
[00001c36] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax
[00001c39] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00
[00001c3d] 7402 jz 00001c41
[00001c3f] ebfe jmp 00001c3f
[00001c41] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04]
[00001c44] 8be5 mov esp,ebp
[00001c46] 5d pop ebp
[00001c47] c3 ret
Size in bytes:(0038) [00001c47]
--
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer