Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v3do66$2ejq2$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic Subject: Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise --- pinned down Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 18:57:57 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 94 Message-ID: <v3do66$2ejq2$1@dont-email.me> References: <v3501h$lpnh$1@dont-email.me> <v36803$2d368$3@i2pn2.org> <v368je$100kd$3@dont-email.me> <v373mr$2d367$5@i2pn2.org> <v37bpa$15n0b$1@dont-email.me> <v37i9p$lls$1@news.muc.de> <87y17smqnq.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v37sap$18mfo$1@dont-email.me> <v38eq4$2foi0$1@i2pn2.org> <v38fe0$1bndb$1@dont-email.me> <v38g31$2foi0$11@i2pn2.org> <v38gi5$1bndb$3@dont-email.me> <v38ici$2fohv$2@i2pn2.org> <v38j17$1c8ir$2@dont-email.me> <v38jgo$2foi0$14@i2pn2.org> <v38jv9$1c8ir$4@dont-email.me> <v39agi$1jiql$1@dont-email.me> <v39v3h$1mtd9$5@dont-email.me> <v3b9kj$2im02$1@i2pn2.org> <v3bale$222n5$1@dont-email.me> <v3bbs2$2im01$1@i2pn2.org> <v3bcre$22a8n$1@dont-email.me> <v3bduk$2im01$2@i2pn2.org> <v3bedb$22f8h$1@dont-email.me> <v3bfbm$2im01$3@i2pn2.org> <v3bg39$22o6m$1@dont-email.me> <v3cbhu$2k3ld$1@i2pn2.org> <v3clo2$28p7n$1@dont-email.me> <v3dft1$2lfup$1@i2pn2.org> <v3dhob$2dio8$1@dont-email.me> <v3dk0d$2lfup$2@i2pn2.org> <v3dkf2$2e2po$1@dont-email.me> <v3dmnc$2lfup$3@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2024 01:57:59 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5617c6a52e82e3edb2307f1199229213"; logging-data="2576194"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/loEx3DDnTr6b9Q6HrAUsd" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:8mwfE2r0V8HHxbyfryxtrlzm7fU= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <v3dmnc$2lfup$3@i2pn2.org> Bytes: 5333 On 5/31/2024 6:33 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 5/31/24 6:54 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 5/31/2024 5:46 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>> On 5/31/24 6:08 PM, olcott wrote: >>>> On 5/31/2024 4:36 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>> On 5/31/24 10:10 AM, olcott wrote: >>>>>> On 5/31/2024 6:16 AM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>> On 5/30/24 11:27 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>> Try and show how HH using an x86 emulator can correctly emulate >>>>>>>> the following x86 machine code such that DD reaches its own >>>>>>>> machine address 00001c47. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why should I, since that isn't what I was saying. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *To me that looks like you know that* >>>>>> *you have been busted in a lie and are backing down* >>>>> >>>>> no, YOU are LYING RIGHT HERE AND NOW. >>>>> >>>>> Prove that I said that the simulation by HH made it there, or admit >>>>> to being a DAMNED LIAR. >>>>> >>>>> What I have been saying is the the DIRECT EXDCUTION of DD, and the >>>>> CORRECT (and complete) simulation of the input to HH by an actual >>>>> UTM will get there. >>>>> >>>> >>>> That has always been the dishonest dodge strawman deception >>>> CHANGE-THE-SUBJECT fake rebuttal regarding >>>> the behavior of DD correctly simulated by pure function HH. >>> >>> But it is your talking about the "correctly simulated by HH" that is >>> the dishonest dodge, >> >> Try and show how HH using an x86 emulator can correctly emulate >> the following x86 machine code such that DD reaches its own >> machine address 00001c47. > > Never said it could. But haven't looked hard enough to be willing to say > it can't, but then, who cares, it doesn't say a thing about the real > halting problem, since H's simulation isn't "correct" by a definition > that relates simulation to non-halting behavior, > "...the Turing machine will halt whenever it enters a final state." Linz(1990:234) *If DD correctly simulated by HH can't possibly reach its own* *final state then DD correctly simulated by HH is non-halting* *When we get as specific as the actual x86 machine code of* *DD then all liars are exposed* typedef int (*ptr)(); // ptr is pointer to int function in C 00 int HH(ptr p, ptr i); 01 int DD(ptr p) 02 { 03 int Halt_Status = HH(p, p); 04 if (Halt_Status) 05 HERE: goto HERE; 06 return Halt_Status; 07 } 08 09 int main() 10 { 11 HH(DD,DD); 12 return 0; 13 } _DD() [00001c22] 55 push ebp [00001c23] 8bec mov ebp,esp [00001c25] 51 push ecx [00001c26] 8b4508 mov eax,[ebp+08] [00001c29] 50 push eax ; push DD 1c22 [00001c2a] 8b4d08 mov ecx,[ebp+08] [00001c2d] 51 push ecx ; push DD 1c22 [00001c2e] e80ff7ffff call 00001342 ; call HH [00001c33] 83c408 add esp,+08 [00001c36] 8945fc mov [ebp-04],eax [00001c39] 837dfc00 cmp dword [ebp-04],+00 [00001c3d] 7402 jz 00001c41 [00001c3f] ebfe jmp 00001c3f [00001c41] 8b45fc mov eax,[ebp-04] [00001c44] 8be5 mov esp,ebp [00001c46] 5d pop ebp [00001c47] c3 ret Size in bytes:(0038) [00001c47] -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer