Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise ---
 pinned down
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 10:58:35 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <v3fgfb$2riae$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v3501h$lpnh$1@dont-email.me> <87y17smqnq.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <v37sap$18mfo$1@dont-email.me> <v38eq4$2foi0$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v38fe0$1bndb$1@dont-email.me> <v38g31$2foi0$11@i2pn2.org>
 <v38gi5$1bndb$3@dont-email.me> <v38ici$2fohv$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v38j17$1c8ir$2@dont-email.me> <v38jgo$2foi0$14@i2pn2.org>
 <v38jv9$1c8ir$4@dont-email.me> <v39agi$1jiql$1@dont-email.me>
 <v39v3h$1mtd9$5@dont-email.me> <v3b9kj$2im02$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v3bale$222n5$1@dont-email.me> <v3bbs2$2im01$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v3bcre$22a8n$1@dont-email.me> <v3bduk$2im01$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v3bedb$22f8h$1@dont-email.me> <v3bfbm$2im01$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v3bg39$22o6m$1@dont-email.me> <v3cbhu$2k3ld$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v3clo2$28p7n$1@dont-email.me> <v3dft1$2lfup$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v3dhob$2dio8$1@dont-email.me> <v3dk0d$2lfup$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v3dkf2$2e2po$1@dont-email.me> <v3dmnc$2lfup$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v3do66$2ejq2$1@dont-email.me>
 <MPG.40c4fbcb474992459896fd@reader.eternal-september.org>
 <v3f9ha$2qh0t$1@dont-email.me> <v3ffpc$2n53n$3@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2024 17:58:36 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5617c6a52e82e3edb2307f1199229213";
	logging-data="3000654"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Iu0ewIT080hnPha5h/+z0"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:F9c0/lSIJQUsLQ//gtpftgqnlBM=
In-Reply-To: <v3ffpc$2n53n$3@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3077

On 6/1/2024 10:46 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 6/1/24 10:00 AM, olcott wrote: >> DD correctly simulated by HH remains stuck in recursive simulation
>> all the time it is simulated even when an infinite number of steps
>> are simulated.
> 
> So, are you admitting that HH just gets stuck and doesn't answer when 
> asked HH(DD,DD)?
> 

Every DD correctly simulated by any HH remains stuck in recursive 
simulation for 1 to ∞ steps of correct simulation.

As I have repeatedly told you hundreds of times DD correctly
simulated by pure simulator HH never gets past its own line 03
and this HH does not halt.

Also DD correctly simulated by pure function HH never gets past
its own line 03 and THIS HH DOES HALT.

If you really can't remember that from one post to the next I suggest
that you print that out so that you can see it immediately before making
any reply.


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer