Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v3fgme$2rmnp$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Cuomo Recants on Ivermectin
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 12:02:22 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <v3fgme$2rmnp$1@dont-email.me>
References: <7fqcnaOYXPhO48r7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v3a3do$1nurk$2@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-D790D2.09021830052024@news.giganews.com>
 <v3abh6$1p68a$2@dont-email.me>
 <_hGdnR09YZZiWsX7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v3amom$1r705$3@dont-email.me> <qqgl5j5gkd239vf3pmlnb659o41qjltnga@4ax.com>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2024 18:02:23 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b1ebf5f43f63460d77df3533a2defa40";
	logging-data="3005177"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/a8MHiyzVsQb6BcY0ToDfEP346+L1fzYA="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:vVhKnsTJcyuuvSW94CfvMrioB5o=
In-Reply-To: <qqgl5j5gkd239vf3pmlnb659o41qjltnga@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2120

On 6/1/2024 2:47 AM, The Horny Goat wrote:
> On Thu, 30 May 2024 16:15:17 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
> wrote:
> 
>>> "Bad for Biden" is not a reason to exclude a candidate from a debate.
>>
>> Maybe not.  But "no chance of winning" is.
> 
> I dunno - George Wallace got full coverage when he ran in 1968 though
> everyone knew that even if he carried a few states in the DeepSouth
> he'd never carry America (though Newsweek magazine DID publish their
> Nixon, Humprey and Wallace covers they had made up in anticipation of
> the result (including a "Deadlock" cover and their cover for their
> International edition).
> 
> I kept that issue for a lot of years but have probably ditched it by
> now...

That example argues for a "blind" numerical threshold of support.