Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise ---
 pinned down
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 11:24:00 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <v3fhv0$2rsbs$4@dont-email.me>
References: <v3501h$lpnh$1@dont-email.me> <v38j17$1c8ir$2@dont-email.me>
 <v38jgo$2foi0$14@i2pn2.org> <v38jv9$1c8ir$4@dont-email.me>
 <v39agi$1jiql$1@dont-email.me> <v39v3h$1mtd9$5@dont-email.me>
 <v3b9kj$2im02$1@i2pn2.org> <v3bale$222n5$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3bbs2$2im01$1@i2pn2.org> <v3bcre$22a8n$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3bduk$2im01$2@i2pn2.org> <v3bedb$22f8h$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3bfbm$2im01$3@i2pn2.org> <v3bg39$22o6m$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3cbhu$2k3ld$1@i2pn2.org> <v3clo2$28p7n$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3dft1$2lfup$1@i2pn2.org> <v3dhob$2dio8$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3dk0d$2lfup$2@i2pn2.org> <v3dkf2$2e2po$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3dmnc$2lfup$3@i2pn2.org> <v3do66$2ejq2$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3dqka$2lfup$4@i2pn2.org> <v3dsev$2f6ul$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3dtt4$2lfup$5@i2pn2.org> <v3dvr3$2jgjd$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3e0rj$2lfup$6@i2pn2.org> <v3e1m6$2jmc2$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3f09p$2n53o$1@i2pn2.org> <v3feqn$2rdp3$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3fgat$2n53n$5@i2pn2.org> <v3fhan$2rsbs$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3fhmr$2ro2o$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2024 18:24:01 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5617c6a52e82e3edb2307f1199229213";
	logging-data="3010940"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18G/e4Ia6qFNj+u4IHdwrwJ"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:WHAvAAeCUhRFPa3AAhFsk0IZDmM=
In-Reply-To: <v3fhmr$2ro2o$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4236

On 6/1/2024 11:19 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> Op 01.jun.2024 om 18:13 schreef olcott:
>> On 6/1/2024 10:56 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 6/1/24 11:30 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>
>>>> *I will not discuss any other points with you until after you either*
>>>> (a) Acknowledge that DD correctly simulated by HH and ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ correctly
>>>>      simulated by embedded_H remain stuck in recursive simulation for
>>>>      1 to ∞ of correct simulation or
>>>>
>>>> (b) Correctly prove otherwise.
>>>
>>> And until you answer the question of what that actually means, I will 
>>> reply WHO CARES.
>>>
>>
>> typedef int (*ptr)();  // ptr is pointer to int function in C
>> 00       int HH(ptr p, ptr i);
>> 01       int DD(ptr p)
>> 02       {
>> 03         int Halt_Status = HH(p, p);
>> 04         if (Halt_Status)
>> 05           HERE: goto HERE;
>> 06         return Halt_Status;
>> 07       }
>> 08
>> 09       int main()
>> 10       {
>> 11         HH(DD,DD);
>> 12         return 0;
>> 13       }
>>
>> Every DD correctly simulated by any HH of the infinite set of HH/DD
>> pairs that match the above template never reaches past its own simulated
>> line 03 in 1 to ∞ steps of correct simulation of DD by HH.
>>
>> In this case HH is either a pure simulator that never halts or
>> HH is a pure function that stops simulating after some finite number
>> of simulated lines. The line count is stored in a local variable.
>> The pure function HH always returns the meaningless value of 56
>> after it stops simulating.
>>
> 
> The simulated D never reaches past line 03, because the simulated HH 
> never halts in 1 to ∞ steps of correct simulation of HH by HH.
> I have told you that so many times.
> HH is required to halt, thus HH does not match the requirement.


HH correctly reports that because DD calls HH(DD,DD) in
recursive simulation that DD never halts.

HHH(HH,DD,DD) would report that HH halts.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer