Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Every D(D) simulated by H presents non-halting behavior to H ###
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:58:51 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v3fngr$2o13h$1@i2pn2.org>
References: <v18e32$1vbql$1@dont-email.me> <v22k4b$umr4$1@dont-email.me>
	<v24oah$1h4u3$1@dont-email.me> <v256fc$1kais$1@dont-email.me>
	<v27d05$25ga0$1@dont-email.me> <v2838r$29rd7$1@dont-email.me>
	<v2a8th$2ps09$1@dont-email.me> <v2ahqc$2qvr9$1@dont-email.me>
	<v2cb5s$39fvg$1@dont-email.me> <v2crk0$3cifp$1@dont-email.me>
	<v2cvuo$3dfkm$1@dont-email.me> <v2i921$jvcs$5@dont-email.me>
	<v2k7fe$12vjm$1@dont-email.me> <v2l0q8$17mu1$1@dont-email.me>
	<v2n4f7$1ms87$1@dont-email.me> <v2nfma$1or9h$4@dont-email.me>
	<v2pkqq$28mg0$1@dont-email.me> <v2qhr2$2dpfr$6@dont-email.me>
	<v2s6kk$2q0pf$1@dont-email.me> <v2skde$2s65h$1@dont-email.me>
	<v2uthd$3bjch$1@dont-email.me> <v2vdkp$3dtct$3@dont-email.me>
	<v2vned$3fl3r$1@dont-email.me> <v2vp8f$3g0m3$1@dont-email.me>
	<v31f7s$3ukf5$1@dont-email.me> <v3236b$29pd$1@dont-email.me>
	<v3249e$28n59$1@i2pn2.org> <v325v5$2pkb$4@dont-email.me>
	<v347fh$hf5j$2@dont-email.me> <v34s4p$l6mn$1@dont-email.me>
	<v39jhp$1l09d$3@dont-email.me> <v39u6j$1mtd9$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:58:51 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2884721"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3103
Lines: 28

Am Thu, 30 May 2024 08:16:03 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 5/30/2024 5:14 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>> Op 28.mei.2024 om 17:10 schreef olcott:
>>> On 5/28/2024 4:17 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>> Op 27.mei.2024 om 16:39 schreef olcott:
>>>>> On 5/27/2024 9:10 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 5/27/24 9:52 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 5/27/2024 3:11 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2024-05-26 16:50:21 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>>
>> When H correctly simulated by pure simulator H cannot possibly reach
>> its own simulated final state and halt in an infinite number
>> of simulated steps we can conclude that less than an infinite number of
>> steps are also not enough steps for H to halt.
>> 
>> This tells us that when 1 to ∞ steps of H are correctly simulated by
>> H that H correctly simulated by H never halts under any circumstances
>> what-so-ever
>> *CONCLUSIVELY PROVING THAT H CORRECTLY SIMULATED BY H DOES NOT HALT*
>> 
>> By this proof, we see that this H contradicts the requirement that it 
>> should halt.
>> We cannot continue with this before we have agreement about it.
Well played:
> You should put my words in quotes otherwise people will be thinking
> that you agree with me word-for-word.

-- 
joes