Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach its own line 06
 and halt
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 18:13:08 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v3fobk$2o13h$3@i2pn2.org>
References: <v3a40t$1o2ef$1@dont-email.me> <v3asj2$2ihjj$2@i2pn2.org>
	<v3asv1$1s60g$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 18:13:08 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2884721"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2109
Lines: 25

Am Thu, 30 May 2024 17:01:05 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 5/30/2024 4:54 PM, joes wrote:
>> Am Thu, 30 May 2024 09:55:24 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>> 
>>> Everyone with sufficient knowledge of C can easily determine that D
>>> correctly emulated by any *pure function* H (using an x86 emulator)
>>> cannot possibly reach its own simulated final state at line 06 and halt.
>> Yeah, of course not, if H doesn’t halt.
> To actually understand my words (as in an actual honest dialogue)
> you must pay careful attention to every single word. Maybe you
> had no idea that *pure functions* must always halt.
That is more commonly called a terminating function. Pure refers to the
absence of side effects.

> Or maybe you did not know that every computation that never reaches
> its own final state *DOES NOT HALT* even if it stops running because
> it is no longer simulated.
Exactly. Aborting a simulation makes it incorrect.

>>> Because this is a key piece of my life's work and my POD24 diagnosis
>>> indicates that I am running out of time I intend to keep posting this
>>> until I have three concurrences or one correct rebuttal.
I concur.

-- 
joes