Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: immibis <news@immibis.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise ---
 pinned down
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:53:48 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 46
Message-ID: <v3fqns$2tc3s$4@dont-email.me>
References: <v3501h$lpnh$1@dont-email.me> <v38ici$2fohv$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v38j17$1c8ir$2@dont-email.me> <v38jgo$2foi0$14@i2pn2.org>
 <v38jv9$1c8ir$4@dont-email.me> <v39agi$1jiql$1@dont-email.me>
 <v39v3h$1mtd9$5@dont-email.me> <v3b9kj$2im02$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v3bale$222n5$1@dont-email.me> <v3bbs2$2im01$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v3bcre$22a8n$1@dont-email.me> <v3bduk$2im01$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v3bedb$22f8h$1@dont-email.me> <v3bfbm$2im01$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v3bg39$22o6m$1@dont-email.me> <v3cbhu$2k3ld$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v3clo2$28p7n$1@dont-email.me> <v3dft1$2lfup$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v3dhob$2dio8$1@dont-email.me> <v3dk0d$2lfup$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v3dkf2$2e2po$1@dont-email.me> <v3dmnc$2lfup$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v3do66$2ejq2$1@dont-email.me> <v3dqka$2lfup$4@i2pn2.org>
 <v3dsev$2f6ul$1@dont-email.me> <v3dtt4$2lfup$5@i2pn2.org>
 <v3dvr3$2jgjd$1@dont-email.me> <v3e0rj$2lfup$6@i2pn2.org>
 <v3e1m6$2jmc2$1@dont-email.me> <v3f09p$2n53o$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v3feqn$2rdp3$1@dont-email.me> <v3fgat$2n53n$5@i2pn2.org>
 <v3fhan$2rsbs$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2024 20:53:48 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a1837118cd62700985cbfcccff128def";
	logging-data="3059836"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+1xrYOSCV8A7YvmejJkLbK"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8C+KpvKdJxwXH0WOJIvwtfOCIs0=
In-Reply-To: <v3fhan$2rsbs$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3743

On 1/06/24 18:13, olcott wrote:
> On 6/1/2024 10:56 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 6/1/24 11:30 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>
>>> *I will not discuss any other points with you until after you either*
>>> (a) Acknowledge that DD correctly simulated by HH and ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ correctly
>>>      simulated by embedded_H remain stuck in recursive simulation for
>>>      1 to ∞ of correct simulation or
>>>
>>> (b) Correctly prove otherwise.
>>
>> And until you answer the question of what that actually means, I will 
>> reply WHO CARES.
>>
> 
> typedef int (*ptr)();  // ptr is pointer to int function in C
> 00       int HH(ptr p, ptr i);
> 01       int DD(ptr p)
> 02       {
> 03         int Halt_Status = HH(p, p);
> 04         if (Halt_Status)
> 05           HERE: goto HERE;
> 06         return Halt_Status;
> 07       }
> 08
> 09       int main()
> 10       {
> 11         HH(DD,DD);
> 12         return 0;
> 13       }
> 
> Every DD correctly simulated by any HH of the infinite set of HH/DD
> pairs that match the above template never reaches past its own simulated
> line 03 in 1 to ∞ steps of correct simulation of DD by HH.
> 
> In this case HH is either a pure simulator that never halts or
> HH is a pure function that stops simulating after some finite number
> of simulated lines. The line count is stored in a local variable.
> The pure function HH always returns the meaningless value of 56
> after it stops simulating.

56 is a nonzero number. In C, nonzero numbers are 'true'. Returning 56 
means that DD(DD) halts, which is incorrect if HH returns 56.

>