Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong -- Only basis for rebuttal in
 the last 3 years
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 19:02:36 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v3fr8b$2o13h$10@i2pn2.org>
References: <v3501h$lpnh$1@dont-email.me> <v362eu$2d367$3@i2pn2.org>
	<v363js$vg63$2@dont-email.me> <v36803$2d368$3@i2pn2.org>
	<v368je$100kd$3@dont-email.me> <v373mr$2d367$5@i2pn2.org>
	<v37bpa$15n0b$1@dont-email.me> <v37i9p$lls$1@news.muc.de>
	<87y17smqnq.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v37sap$18mfo$1@dont-email.me>
	<v3elpv$2mjca$1@dont-email.me> <v3fdif$2r6gg$1@dont-email.me>
	<v3fe4u$2r8b7$1@dont-email.me> <v3ffk9$2rh8f$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 19:02:36 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2884721"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2004
Lines: 20

Am Sat, 01 Jun 2024 10:44:09 -0500 schrieb olcott:

> On 6/1/2024 10:18 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>> Op 01.jun.2024 om 17:09 schreef olcott:
>>> On 6/1/2024 3:23 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>> On 2024-05-29 18:31:52 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>
>>>
>> Similarly:
>> 
>> Because HH correctly simulated by HH remains stuck in recursive
>> simulation for 1 to ∞ steps of correct simulation this conclusively
>> proves that it is correct to reject HH as non-halting no matter what
>> the behavior of the directly executed HH(DD,DD) is.
> 
> I am going to simply ignore your disingenuous replies.
> HH(DD,DD) halts as an empirical fact.
That means it returns, right? Making D proceed past line 4.

-- 
joes