Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v3g4pp$2vqa1$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: GUILTY. All 34 counts.
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 17:45:26 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <v3g4pp$2vqa1$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v3aqcf$1rrag$1@dont-email.me> <v3aqf0$1rrj1$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3atud$1sd52$1@dont-email.me> <t1hl5jp3a55nna5smsbd7jpclm0gtgtpvl@4ax.com>
 <949803298.738926624.435035.anim8rfsk-cox.net@news.easynews.com>
 <KhSdndW6vPq5Hsb7nZ2dnZfqnPoAAAAA@giganews.com>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2024 23:45:29 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b1ebf5f43f63460d77df3533a2defa40";
	logging-data="3139905"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/QrTeVlUr19NZA+8ZTuPCbHoHTttYGt+w="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RGLz5oBdGspc4aWQuIBtbyq7qvI=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <KhSdndW6vPq5Hsb7nZ2dnZfqnPoAAAAA@giganews.com>
Bytes: 2286

On 6/1/2024 4:23 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
> On Jun 1, 2024 at 2:24:53 AM PDT, "anim8rfsk" <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
> 
>> The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> wrote:
>>>   On Thu, 30 May 2024 18:17:49 -0400, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>   wrote:
>>>   
>>>>   SCOTUS to the rescue: It'll be overturned on appeal, because the judge
>>>>   was having an affair with his sister-in-law...
>>>   
>>>   Trump doesn't care about anything except an appeal that goes past the
>>>   first week of November.....
>>>   
>>
>> After he wins, can he pardon himself?
> 
> Yes and no. He couldn't pardon himself for the state charges but he could
> pardon himself for the federal charge that enabled the state's charges to
> survive the statute of limitations and without that federal charge, the
> state's entire case is void.

So, he's punished for breaking laws that were in effect *then*, but only 
if those laws are in effect *now*.  How about the reverse, I wonder...