Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise ---
 pinned down
Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2024 18:12:42 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 57
Message-ID: <v3g9tc$30pbl$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v3501h$lpnh$1@dont-email.me> <v3dhob$2dio8$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3dk0d$2lfup$2@i2pn2.org> <v3dkf2$2e2po$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3dmnc$2lfup$3@i2pn2.org> <v3do66$2ejq2$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3dqka$2lfup$4@i2pn2.org> <v3dsev$2f6ul$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3dtt4$2lfup$5@i2pn2.org> <v3dvr3$2jgjd$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3e0rj$2lfup$6@i2pn2.org> <v3e1m6$2jmc2$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3f09p$2n53o$1@i2pn2.org> <v3feqn$2rdp3$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3fgat$2n53n$5@i2pn2.org> <v3fhan$2rsbs$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3fi55$2n53o$6@i2pn2.org> <v3fiq7$2rsbs$5@dont-email.me>
 <v3flc5$2n53o$7@i2pn2.org> <v3flm8$2sm3s$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3fm1e$2n53n$8@i2pn2.org> <v3fmlc$2sogn$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3fncn$2n53n$9@i2pn2.org> <v3fo1p$2t1ac$2@dont-email.me>
 <v3fqpt$2tjjm$1@dont-email.me> <v3fu48$2ulbk$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3g0b9$2n53n$17@i2pn2.org> <v3g0q4$2v3lp$3@dont-email.me>
 <v3g2t2$2n53n$20@i2pn2.org> <v3g3ja$2vho5$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3g7eb$2n53n$23@i2pn2.org> <v3g80k$30c96$2@dont-email.me>
 <v3g99u$2n53n$24@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2024 01:12:44 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3e1a2626012d6c432c11247ed1bf0353";
	logging-data="3171701"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+HpeeUMFIC9ZDKHrVkdEOD"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CvCVxtRz3O1ESiL7YvJSKRX1syc=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v3g99u$2n53n$24@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 3918

On 6/1/2024 6:02 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 6/1/24 6:40 PM, olcott wrote:
>>
>> Show me where I said anything in the above spec about an aborted 
>> simulation.
> 
> So, why did HH stop simulating after some n steps?
> 
> Did it reach a final state in the simulation? if not, it ABORTED its 
> simulation.
> 
>>
>> When every possible which way DD correctly simulated by HH never reaches
>> past its own simulated line 03 then
> 
> And a simulation either goes until it reaches a final state of the 
> machine it is simulating, or it aborted its simulation.
> 

typedef int (*ptr)();  // ptr is pointer to int function in C
00       int HH(ptr p, ptr i);
01       int DD(ptr p)
02       {
03         int Halt_Status = HH(p, p);
04         if (Halt_Status)
05           HERE: goto HERE;
06         return Halt_Status;
07       }
08
09       int main()
10       {
11         HH(DD,DD);
12         return 0;
13       }

When every DD correctly simulated by any HH cannot possibly reach
past its own simulated line 03 in 1 to ∞ steps of correct simulation
of DD by HH then we have exhaustively examined every possible HH/DD
pair and each element has of this infinite set has the same property.

*THIS PROVES THAT THE INPUT TO H(DD,DD) DOES NOT HALT*
*THIS PROVES THAT THE INPUT TO H(DD,DD) DOES NOT HALT*
*THIS PROVES THAT THE INPUT TO H(DD,DD) DOES NOT HALT*

> Nope, prove you don't know what you are talking about, 
> or are just a liar destined for Gehenna,
> 

Are you willing to bet your soul on the claim that you believe
that you are telling the truth? I do believe that I am telling
the truth and I also believe that you already know that I am
correct about the above statements that I made.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer