Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 09:36:17 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v3heeh$2psm0$3@i2pn2.org>
References: <v3501h$lpnh$1@dont-email.me> <v39v3h$1mtd9$5@dont-email.me>
	<v3b9kj$2im02$1@i2pn2.org> <v3bale$222n5$1@dont-email.me>
	<v3bbs2$2im01$1@i2pn2.org> <v3bcre$22a8n$1@dont-email.me>
	<v3bduk$2im01$2@i2pn2.org> <v3bedb$22f8h$1@dont-email.me>
	<v3bfbm$2im01$3@i2pn2.org> <v3bg39$22o6m$1@dont-email.me>
	<v3cbhu$2k3ld$1@i2pn2.org> <v3clo2$28p7n$1@dont-email.me>
	<v3dft1$2lfup$1@i2pn2.org> <v3dhob$2dio8$1@dont-email.me>
	<v3dk0d$2lfup$2@i2pn2.org> <v3dkf2$2e2po$1@dont-email.me>
	<v3dmnc$2lfup$3@i2pn2.org> <v3do66$2ejq2$1@dont-email.me>
	<MPG.40c4fbcb474992459896fd@reader.eternal-september.org>
	<v3f9ha$2qh0t$1@dont-email.me> <v3ffpc$2n53n$3@i2pn2.org>
	<v3fgfb$2riae$2@dont-email.me> <v3fh1a$2n53o$5@i2pn2.org>
	<v3fhkr$2rsbs$2@dont-email.me> <v3fig4$2n53n$6@i2pn2.org>
	<v3fj8h$2rsbs$6@dont-email.me> <v3g0bg$2n53n$18@i2pn2.org>
	<v3g0n2$2v3lp$2@dont-email.me> <v3g329$2n53n$21@i2pn2.org>
	<v3g3np$2vk55$1@dont-email.me> <v3g7e9$2n53n$22@i2pn2.org>
	<v3g7r8$30c96$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 09:36:17 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2945728"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3000
Lines: 28

Am Sat, 01 Jun 2024 17:37:28 -0500 schrieb olcott:

> On 6/1/2024 5:30 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 6/1/24 5:27 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 6/1/2024 4:15 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 6/1/24 4:35 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 6/1/2024 3:29 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/1/24 12:46 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/1/2024 11:33 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/1/24 12:18 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/2024 11:08 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/24 11:58 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/2024 10:46 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/24 10:00 AM, olcott wrote: 

>>> Every DD correctly simulated by any HH of the infinite set of HH/DD
>>> pairs that match the above template never reaches past its own
>>> simulated line 03 in 1 to ∞ steps of correct simulation of DD by HH.
>> 
>> But since the simulation was aborted,
> 
> *The above never mentions anything about any simulation being aborted*
Not simulating an infinite number of steps of infinite recursion is
incorrect. You always forget this requirement: the simulation must be
complete.
What are the sets of HH and DD? I thought they were concrete machines.

-- 
joes