Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong ---
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 09:58:13 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <v3i1a5$3cpu7$7@dont-email.me>
References: <v3501h$lpnh$1@dont-email.me> <v3b9kj$2im02$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v3bale$222n5$1@dont-email.me> <v3bbs2$2im01$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v3bcre$22a8n$1@dont-email.me> <v3bduk$2im01$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v3bedb$22f8h$1@dont-email.me> <v3bfbm$2im01$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v3bg39$22o6m$1@dont-email.me> <v3cbhu$2k3ld$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v3clo2$28p7n$1@dont-email.me> <v3dft1$2lfup$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v3dhob$2dio8$1@dont-email.me> <v3dk0d$2lfup$2@i2pn2.org>
 <v3dkf2$2e2po$1@dont-email.me> <v3dmnc$2lfup$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v3do66$2ejq2$1@dont-email.me>
 <MPG.40c4fbcb474992459896fd@reader.eternal-september.org>
 <v3f9ha$2qh0t$1@dont-email.me> <v3ffpc$2n53n$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v3fgfb$2riae$2@dont-email.me> <v3fh1a$2n53o$5@i2pn2.org>
 <v3fhkr$2rsbs$2@dont-email.me> <v3fig4$2n53n$6@i2pn2.org>
 <v3fj8h$2rsbs$6@dont-email.me> <v3g0bg$2n53n$18@i2pn2.org>
 <v3g0n2$2v3lp$2@dont-email.me> <v3g329$2n53n$21@i2pn2.org>
 <v3g3np$2vk55$1@dont-email.me> <v3g7e9$2n53n$22@i2pn2.org>
 <v3g7r8$30c96$1@dont-email.me> <v3heeh$2psm0$3@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2024 16:58:13 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3e1a2626012d6c432c11247ed1bf0353";
	logging-data="3565511"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19slj79CObXuAxhwZwN/39o"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nwTWTrGBfi6XUqlCu3ndoMk5heo=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v3heeh$2psm0$3@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 3548

On 6/2/2024 4:36 AM, joes wrote:
> Am Sat, 01 Jun 2024 17:37:28 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> 
>> On 6/1/2024 5:30 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 6/1/24 5:27 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 6/1/2024 4:15 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 6/1/24 4:35 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/1/2024 3:29 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/1/24 12:46 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/1/2024 11:33 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/24 12:18 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/2024 11:08 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/24 11:58 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/2024 10:46 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/1/24 10:00 AM, olcott wrote:
> 
>>>> Every DD correctly simulated by any HH of the infinite set of HH/DD
>>>> pairs that match the above template never reaches past its own
>>>> simulated line 03 in 1 to ∞ steps of correct simulation of DD by HH.
>>>
>>> But since the simulation was aborted,
>>
>> *The above never mentions anything about any simulation being aborted*
> Not simulating an infinite number of steps of infinite recursion is
> incorrect. You always forget this requirement: the simulation must be
> complete.

When every possible simulation where DD is correctly simulated by HH
never reaches past its own simulated line 03 then we know for sure that
No DD correctly simulated by HH ever halts.

> What are the sets of HH and DD? I thought they were concrete machines.
> 

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer