Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v3i7m0$3e028$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Accelerated frame and Tau Ceti problem Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2024 12:46:55 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 25 Message-ID: <v3i7m0$3e028$2@dont-email.me> References: <jU8lD51x3TEU8EM3MBCn_dr5mwo@jntp> <bfbd9c23228a1757c6d6e84778338e8e@www.novabbs.com> <lc13m1F7qgsU1@mid.individual.net> <rsrS0rFmndU99mqNBYCDLe8cFU0@jntp> <216ebf535d0d2a02a652841aa8ddba8e@www.novabbs.com> <uS_y7EWpgPGPmPD64dwz49GUbzs@jntp> <433858411d3c6aa17c39265c8a20a3f5@www.novabbs.com> <sEqUSAD16HdUqqvsYrCxBcLFj3Y@jntp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2024 18:46:57 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="668b5d9d35d0523cebce84ffc1e2bc44"; logging-data="3604552"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+5321G49kLmNhVNqPRJjE3" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:50X9/mRznZFAbE+2Bcb67WJ7YJs= In-Reply-To: <sEqUSAD16HdUqqvsYrCxBcLFj3Y@jntp> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2164 On 6/2/2024 11:02 AM, Richard Hachel wrote: > Le 02/06/2024 à 15:43, hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) a écrit : > >>> We cannot subtract one deformation from another deformation in such a >>> simplistic way, and it is a serious relativistic mistake to do >>> so. >> >> The mistake is one who has three Nobel prizes in basket weaving >> purports >> to know relativity. > > Watches necessarily have anisochrony, but you don't understand this term. Because you made it up, it's not a part of English or physics. > > You are confusing it with dyschronotropia. Another made up word with no known meaning. > > It is obvious that two watches placed in the same frame of reference > have the same chronotropy. > > They have the same chronotropy. > And yet another made up word.