Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v3l0cs$8d0$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Byte Addressability And Beyond Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 18:01:00 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: <v3l0cs$8d0$1@dont-email.me> References: <v0s17o$2okf4$2@dont-email.me> <v34v62$ln01$1@dont-email.me> <v36bva$10k3v$2@dont-email.me> <2024May29.090435@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <v38opv$1gsj2$3@dont-email.me> <v38rkd$1ha8a$1@dont-email.me> <jwvttifrysb.fsf-monnier+comp.arch@gnu.org> <f90b6e03c727b0f209d64484ec097298@www.novabbs.org> <v3jtd8$3qduu$2@dont-email.me> <20240603132227.00004e0f@yahoo.com> <k6k7O.8602$7jpd.5620@fx47.iad> <v3klhp$3ugeh$1@dont-email.me> <wnl7O.10195$Inzb.2858@fx13.iad> <v3ktnl$3vv86$1@dont-email.me> <K2n7O.29169$61Y8.18080@fx15.iad> Injection-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2024 20:01:00 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="833d2676c15c6cba20cb284ef6441de5"; logging-data="8608"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19obG0POevpMritkl+UByPjjNdIE4IeOX8=" User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:9qfN/xsfOA/Vd8hvUashsZqd0FE= Bytes: 1953 Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home> schrieb: > Adding encryption (which of the dozen standard symmetric and asymmetric > cipher algoritnms?) At the moment, AES. > to a hardware device does increase complexity, and > thus cost at the expense of extensibility (new algorithms come along > periodically). The cost of verifying crypto is a bit higher as it is > very important to get correct when baking into gates. Seems to be fairly common these days, looking at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AES_instruction_set . It appears that one round of AES fits fairly well into one cycle.