Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v3l0cs$8d0$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Byte Addressability And Beyond
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 18:01:00 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <v3l0cs$8d0$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v0s17o$2okf4$2@dont-email.me> <v34v62$ln01$1@dont-email.me>
 <v36bva$10k3v$2@dont-email.me>
 <2024May29.090435@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
 <v38opv$1gsj2$3@dont-email.me> <v38rkd$1ha8a$1@dont-email.me>
 <jwvttifrysb.fsf-monnier+comp.arch@gnu.org>
 <f90b6e03c727b0f209d64484ec097298@www.novabbs.org>
 <v3jtd8$3qduu$2@dont-email.me> <20240603132227.00004e0f@yahoo.com>
 <k6k7O.8602$7jpd.5620@fx47.iad> <v3klhp$3ugeh$1@dont-email.me>
 <wnl7O.10195$Inzb.2858@fx13.iad> <v3ktnl$3vv86$1@dont-email.me>
 <K2n7O.29169$61Y8.18080@fx15.iad>
Injection-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2024 20:01:00 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="833d2676c15c6cba20cb284ef6441de5";
	logging-data="8608"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19obG0POevpMritkl+UByPjjNdIE4IeOX8="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9qfN/xsfOA/Vd8hvUashsZqd0FE=
Bytes: 1953

Scott Lurndal <scott@slp53.sl.home> schrieb:

> Adding encryption (which of the dozen standard symmetric and asymmetric
> cipher algoritnms?)

At the moment, AES.

> to a hardware device does increase complexity, and
> thus cost at the expense of extensibility (new algorithms come along
> periodically).  The cost of verifying crypto is a bit higher as it is
> very important to get correct when baking into gates.

Seems to be fairly common these days, looking at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AES_instruction_set .

It appears that one round of AES fits fairly well into one cycle.