Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v3l1ib$5d3$6@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v3l1ib$5d3$6@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 13:20:59 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 73
Message-ID: <v3l1ib$5d3$6@dont-email.me>
References: <v3501h$lpnh$1@dont-email.me> <v362eu$2d367$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v363js$vg63$2@dont-email.me> <v36803$2d368$3@i2pn2.org>
 <v368je$100kd$3@dont-email.me> <v373mr$2d367$5@i2pn2.org>
 <v37bpa$15n0b$1@dont-email.me> <v37i9p$lls$1@news.muc.de>
 <87y17smqnq.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v37sap$18mfo$1@dont-email.me>
 <v38eq4$2foi0$1@i2pn2.org> <v38fe0$1bndb$1@dont-email.me>
 <v38g31$2foi0$11@i2pn2.org> <v38gi5$1bndb$3@dont-email.me>
 <v38ici$2fohv$2@i2pn2.org> <v38j17$1c8ir$2@dont-email.me>
 <v38jgo$2foi0$14@i2pn2.org> <v38jv9$1c8ir$4@dont-email.me>
 <v39agi$1jiql$1@dont-email.me> <v39v3h$1mtd9$5@dont-email.me>
 <v3b9kj$2im02$1@i2pn2.org> <v3bale$222n5$1@dont-email.me>
 <v3c1qo$25d0v$1@dont-email.me> <v3cpdu$297ao$3@dont-email.me>
 <v3k4ec$3ri9o$1@dont-email.me> <v3kfmt$3t5s5$9@dont-email.me>
 <v3kl6m$3ueeo$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2024 20:21:00 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f629d257ac302b24ac32e99a4ff4b1b3";
	logging-data="5539"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18vAy5fRkzQXe0ZogTKKw3S"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VKURMDjQFHsEWGJQVXyJc3iUOb0=
In-Reply-To: <v3kl6m$3ueeo$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4512

On 6/3/2024 9:49 AM, Mikko wrote:
> On 2024-06-03 13:16:12 +0000, olcott said:
> 
>> On 6/3/2024 5:03 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>> On 2024-05-31 15:13:02 +0000, olcott said:
>>>
>>>> On 5/31/2024 3:30 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-05-31 01:54:52 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/30/2024 8:37 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 5/30/24 9:31 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 5/30/2024 2:40 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2024-05-30 01:15:21 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> x <is> a finite string Turing machine description that 
>>>>>>>>>> SPECIFIES behavior. The term: "representing" is inaccurate.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No, x is a description of the Turing machine that specifies the 
>>>>>>>>> behaviour
>>>>>>>>> that H is required to report.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> That is what I said.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Note, the string doesn't DIRECTLY specify behavior, but only 
>>>>>>> indirectly as a description/representation of the Turing Mach
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The string directly SPECIFIES behavior to a UTM or to
>>>>>> any TM based on a UTM.
>>>>>
>>>>> An UTM interpretes the string as a specification of behaviour
>>>>
>>>> YES, exactly !!!
>>>>
>>>>> and another Turing machine may interprete likewise. But in a
>>>>> different context the interpretation is different.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> When Ĥ is applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩
>>>> Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.qy ∞
>>>> Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.qn
>>>>
>>>> When embedded_H <is> a UTM or <is> a halting computation based on a
>>>> UTM then the ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ input to embedded_H SPECIFIES that ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ 
>>>> correctly
>>>> simulated by embedded_H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final
>>>> state at ⟨Ĥ.qn⟩.
>>>
>>> There is no requirement to follow the pecifications by embedded_H.
>>
>>
>> In other words embedded_H can simply play bingo and never halt and 
>> still correctly decide the halt status of its input?
> 
> Not of the input text but of the machine and input that the text
> describes. The input to H contains enough information that the
> machine can be constructed and run with the input. If the prediction
> by H differs from the actual execution of the machine the prediction
> is wrong and H is not a halt decider.
> 


int sum(int x, int y) { return x + y; }
sum(2,3) cannot return the sum of 5 + 6.

DD correctly simulated by HH does have provably
different behavior than DD(DD) so HH is is not
allowed to report on the behavior of DD(DD).

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer