Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v3l1ib$5d3$6@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Two dozen people were simply wrong --- Try to prove otherwise Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 13:20:59 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 73 Message-ID: <v3l1ib$5d3$6@dont-email.me> References: <v3501h$lpnh$1@dont-email.me> <v362eu$2d367$3@i2pn2.org> <v363js$vg63$2@dont-email.me> <v36803$2d368$3@i2pn2.org> <v368je$100kd$3@dont-email.me> <v373mr$2d367$5@i2pn2.org> <v37bpa$15n0b$1@dont-email.me> <v37i9p$lls$1@news.muc.de> <87y17smqnq.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v37sap$18mfo$1@dont-email.me> <v38eq4$2foi0$1@i2pn2.org> <v38fe0$1bndb$1@dont-email.me> <v38g31$2foi0$11@i2pn2.org> <v38gi5$1bndb$3@dont-email.me> <v38ici$2fohv$2@i2pn2.org> <v38j17$1c8ir$2@dont-email.me> <v38jgo$2foi0$14@i2pn2.org> <v38jv9$1c8ir$4@dont-email.me> <v39agi$1jiql$1@dont-email.me> <v39v3h$1mtd9$5@dont-email.me> <v3b9kj$2im02$1@i2pn2.org> <v3bale$222n5$1@dont-email.me> <v3c1qo$25d0v$1@dont-email.me> <v3cpdu$297ao$3@dont-email.me> <v3k4ec$3ri9o$1@dont-email.me> <v3kfmt$3t5s5$9@dont-email.me> <v3kl6m$3ueeo$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2024 20:21:00 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="f629d257ac302b24ac32e99a4ff4b1b3"; logging-data="5539"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18vAy5fRkzQXe0ZogTKKw3S" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:VKURMDjQFHsEWGJQVXyJc3iUOb0= In-Reply-To: <v3kl6m$3ueeo$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 4512 On 6/3/2024 9:49 AM, Mikko wrote: > On 2024-06-03 13:16:12 +0000, olcott said: > >> On 6/3/2024 5:03 AM, Mikko wrote: >>> On 2024-05-31 15:13:02 +0000, olcott said: >>> >>>> On 5/31/2024 3:30 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>> On 2024-05-31 01:54:52 +0000, olcott said: >>>>> >>>>>> On 5/30/2024 8:37 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>> On 5/30/24 9:31 AM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>> On 5/30/2024 2:40 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>>>>>>> On 2024-05-30 01:15:21 +0000, olcott said: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> x <is> a finite string Turing machine description that >>>>>>>>>> SPECIFIES behavior. The term: "representing" is inaccurate. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> No, x is a description of the Turing machine that specifies the >>>>>>>>> behaviour >>>>>>>>> that H is required to report. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> That is what I said. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Note, the string doesn't DIRECTLY specify behavior, but only >>>>>>> indirectly as a description/representation of the Turing Mach >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The string directly SPECIFIES behavior to a UTM or to >>>>>> any TM based on a UTM. >>>>> >>>>> An UTM interpretes the string as a specification of behaviour >>>> >>>> YES, exactly !!! >>>> >>>>> and another Turing machine may interprete likewise. But in a >>>>> different context the interpretation is different. >>>>> >>>> >>>> When Ĥ is applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩ >>>> Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.qy ∞ >>>> Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.qn >>>> >>>> When embedded_H <is> a UTM or <is> a halting computation based on a >>>> UTM then the ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ input to embedded_H SPECIFIES that ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ >>>> correctly >>>> simulated by embedded_H cannot possibly reach its own simulated final >>>> state at ⟨Ĥ.qn⟩. >>> >>> There is no requirement to follow the pecifications by embedded_H. >> >> >> In other words embedded_H can simply play bingo and never halt and >> still correctly decide the halt status of its input? > > Not of the input text but of the machine and input that the text > describes. The input to H contains enough information that the > machine can be constructed and run with the input. If the prediction > by H differs from the actual execution of the machine the prediction > is wrong and H is not a halt decider. > int sum(int x, int y) { return x + y; } sum(2,3) cannot return the sum of 5 + 6. DD correctly simulated by HH does have provably different behavior than DD(DD) so HH is is not allowed to report on the behavior of DD(DD). -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer