Article <v3lb0u$2452$1@dont-email.me>

Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v3lb0u$2452$1@dont-email.me>

Deutsch English Français Italiano

<v3lb0u$2452$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: C23 thoughts and opinions
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 14:02:21 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <v3lb0u$2452$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v2l828$18v7f$1@dont-email.me>
 <v2o57g$1t5p4$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <v3dkgh$2e0me$1@dont-email.me> <v3gou9$36n61$3@dont-email.me>
 <v3hrq7$1o743$1@news.xmission.com> <v3i7u3$3bp0v$1@dont-email.me>
 <20240602124448.704@kylheku.com> <864ja9ojit.fsf@linuxsc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2024 23:02:22 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="969ea982a6f3853589d236756461ca4b";
	logging-data="69794"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+DNodXKjb8DnR7MEUaOdDuRMV7lyJS7Bc="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:N/hbD0gO7inATcdnQu1vwXFTOF0=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <864ja9ojit.fsf@linuxsc.com>
Bytes: 1986

On 6/3/2024 1:31 PM, Tim Rentsch wrote:
> Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> writes:
> 
>> On 2024-06-02, Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> I've always considered
>>>    for (;;)
>>> preferable over
>>>    while (1)
>>
>> Of course it is preferable.  The idiom constitutes the language's direct
>> support for unconditional looping, not requiring that to be requested by
>> an extraneous always-true expression.
>>
>> Using while (1) or while (true) is like i = i + 1 instead
>> of ++i, or while (*dst++ = *src++); instead of strcpy.  [...]
> 
> Using for (;;) for an infinite loop is an abomination.  Anyone
> who advocates following that rule is an instrument of Satan.

Better than goto? ;^D