Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: x <x@x.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
Subject: Re: the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 14:24:53 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 121
Message-ID: <v3lcb5$25ho$1@dont-email.me>
References: <665CFEC7.6BF3@ix.netcom.com> <665D50AE.6213@ix.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2024 23:24:54 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bcd90087456be8bff47ef562126b0f2d";
	logging-data="71224"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+WpbbIpjl3I1/ky7oQe64g/shYeWmSZ5Q="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wF1m5vYXepOsNth1opsuMLB4E+w=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <665D50AE.6213@ix.netcom.com>
Bytes: 4609

On 6/2/24 22:12, The Starmaker wrote:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905
>>
>> Most people are not aware..(expecially in this newsgroup)
>>
>> that in 1905 there was no papers by Albert Einstein  entitled
>>
>> 'the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905'.
>>
>> It didn't exist. The titles have different names.
>>
>> It wasn't called the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905.
>>
>> Certaintly not in 1906, 1907, 1908, 1909, ...when????
>>
>> Everybody HERE call the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905
>>
>> The Special Theory of Relativity - 1905
>>
>> but there was no such thing!!!!
>>
>> wats wrong wit you people????
>>
>> It's INSANITY!
>>
>> There was no 'the Special Theory of Relativity' in 1905!
>>
>> Certaintly not in 1906, 1907, 1908, 1909, ...when????
>>
>> GET IT TOGETHER.
>>
>> do something right for once!
>>
>> you people are insane...
> 
> Here are the actual titles of his 1905 papers:
> 
> ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES
> DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY CONTENT?
>   by A. Einstein [Annalen der Physik 18 (1905)
> 
> 
> Where is the title:  the Special Theory of Relativity - 1905????
> 
> 
> The Truth...it doesn't exist.

This is a test post.

There is a religion called psychology.

It appeals to atheists.

Do words have meaning?

Different languages have different symbols or sound patterns.

There is the concept of health and disease.

That is applied to the bodies of plants and animals.

Then there is the phenomenon of ideas and minds.

In general there is the concept of 'truth' and 'lies'
and that is often applied to 'ideas'.  Are 'ideas'
'true' or 'false'.

Then there is 'Psyche' the wife of Cupid in the Greco-Roman
religion.

'Psyche' is some times translated as meaning 'soul'.  Do
'souls' exist?  Can they be studied.

The article of faith of the belief system or pseudoscience
called 'psychology' however is that minds undergo a health
or disease process similar to the bodies of plants and
animals.

Now in computers there is the concept of 'hardware' and
'software'.

There is also something called 'brains' and 'minds'.

Psychology utterly confuses the two.

It ceases to be 'science' when it crosses the line, and
decides that 'mental health' and 'mental disease' are
something different from true ideas and good habits,
or false ideas and bad habits.

Now when it comes to Einstein there was a paperback
book some while ago, and my guess is that it is still
in print.

He came up with the idea of 'special relativity' and
the later 'general relativity'.

Now 'semantics' has to do with the meaning of words.

When it comes to gravity, there is also something called
'static electricity'.  Is 'space-time' bent opposite for
a positive charges versus a negative charge in an electric
field?  But there is also 'ether'.  Just change the meaning
of the word 'ether' to note all of the properties of
what is sometimes called 'space-time'.  What is the
meaning of the words 'true' or 'false'?

When it comes to special relativity, however, the speed of
light is a CONSTANT, and that is an OBSERVED PROPERTY.
(Sorry if all caps are too severe for you.)  He may have
called something 'special' and 'general' later.  I think
he wrote that book a lot later.

As far as 'mental health' and 'mental disease' versus
'truth' and 'lies' all you can do is shrug.

This post will probably not get sent.