Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v3lqfs$47e8$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Kamala Outright Lies About Women's Basketball Brackets
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 01:26:20 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 93
Message-ID: <v3lqfs$47e8$2@dont-email.me>
References: <bV-dnTuJNehKEMr7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v3l4ge$11l1$1@dont-email.me> <v3l7an$19rc$2@dont-email.me> <v3lo89$41jg$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2024 03:26:21 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c31329cf03b7679a65d97ce946c3fe4f";
	logging-data="138696"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18s0cE6Gptnjc+IVrjpIwZXkN3X1rACcKk="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pguZycFfRHAK6xAKJWKrBx6L1kY=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Bytes: 4626

super70s  <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>On 2024-06-03 19:59:19 +0000, Adam H. Kerman said:
>
>> super70s  <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 2024-06-02 13:27:33 +0000, FPP said:
>>> 
>>>> On 6/1/24 1:14 PM, super70s wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-05-31 10:21:51 +0000, FPP said:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 5/30/24 12:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <v3a3ra$1o1jk$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 5/29/24 4:19 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Kamala Harris claimed that women's basketball wasn't even
>allowed to have
>>>>>>>>> playoff brackets until 2022, when in reality, women's
>basketball has been
>>>>>>>>> using them since 1982, 42 years.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Kamala herself tweeted out exchanges with her husband in 2021
>where they
>>>>>>>>> talked about who they were choosing in their brackets.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/yYjH5g9ogXE?t=409
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Between Biden's almost weekly made-up stories about his past and Kamala
>>>>>>>>> gaslighting us about women's basketball, what the hell is going
>on in the
>>>>>>>>> White House?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Now tell the rest of the story, coward. But you won't, so I'll have to
>>>>>>>> do it again.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Mediaite reached out to the Vice President's office for
>clarification and
>>>>>>>>> was told that Harris did, in fact, misspeak and that she meant to
>>> say that
>>>>>>>>> the use of the "March Madness" copyright was only made available to the
>>>>>>>>> women's tournament lin 2022.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hahahahahahahahahaha!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> "Misspeak". That's politician code for "lie".
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Feel better now, Bunky? She owned up to her mistake and explained it.
>>>>>>>> Something you or any of your Oathkeeper buddies would have the stones
>>>>>>>> to do.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Just like you refuse to do in the UNRWA thread.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Really. You need to learn how to read.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You don't seem to mind outright lying and felony convictions, but if
>>>>>> someone owns up to a mistake, you can't abide that.
>>>>> 
>>>>> A women's basketball gaffe? This is what you call scraping the bottom
>>>>> of the barrel for some "gotcha" moment.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Everyone know being wrong about college basketball is the same as rape,
>>>> fraud, election interference, witness tampering, insurrection, stealing
>>>> classified documents, obstruction of justice etc.
>>>> 
>>>> It's all equal to our resident Oathkeeper lawyer.
>>> 
>>> Yes I'm sure Adam H. Kerman, Esq. would agree. Even if he does need to
>>> buff up on his copyright and trademark case law.
>> 
>> Still contributing STOOPID rather than actual discussion, Dear
>> Sockpuppet.
>
>That's the second time you've said that, who am I supposed to be a 
>"sockpuppet" of?
>
>> Go for it. Name the aspect of either trademark or copyright law that
>> would prevent the women's sport of intercollegiate athletics from having
>> a system of playoffs created to meet the needs of their sport.
>
>Haven't you thoroughly embarrassed yourself enough with the "it's too 
>generic a concept to be trademarked" boner? That's all I was referring 
>to.

I didn't correct the spokesflak use of "trademark" rather than
"copyright"; that was BTR1701.

You're still ducking the question. Clearly you cannot answer because you
are ignorant as fuck. I still want to know why you believe that women's
college basketball couldn't have "playoff brackets" till they had
permission from the trademark holder. Hint: The trademark wasn't on the
concept of "playoff brackets".