Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Kamala Outright Lies About Women's Basketball Brackets
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 02:32:47 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 111
Message-ID: <v3mfuv$b8f0$1@dont-email.me>
References: <bV-dnTuJNehKEMr7nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@giganews.com> <v3a3ra$1o1jk$1@dont-email.me> <atropos-037C68.09054230052024@news.giganews.com> <v3c8bv$26d38$2@dont-email.me> <v3fkuj$2sitj$1@dont-email.me> <v3hs05$3c55u$3@dont-email.me> <v3l4ge$11l1$1@dont-email.me> <v3l7an$19rc$2@dont-email.me> <v3lo89$41jg$1@dont-email.me> <v3lqfs$47e8$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2024 09:32:49 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8ac6b0ff8e4f2749cbac70f51b6b3027";
	logging-data="369120"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/2CCjF4J3XECUe4AgcO/JxRqs2KBtoAwI="
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pGkm+kixMoYYrf0mhfq9QaA4OB0=
Bytes: 5593

On 2024-06-04 01:26:20 +0000, Adam H. Kerman said:

> super70s  <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>> On 2024-06-03 19:59:19 +0000, Adam H. Kerman said:
>> 
>>> super70s  <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On 2024-06-02 13:27:33 +0000, FPP said:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 6/1/24 1:14 PM, super70s wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-05-31 10:21:51 +0000, FPP said:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 5/30/24 12:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article <v3a3ra$1o1jk$1@dont-email.me>, FPP <fredp1571@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 5/29/24 4:19 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Kamala Harris claimed that women's basketball wasn't even
>> allowed to have
>>>>>>>>>> playoff brackets until 2022, when in reality, women's
>> basketball has been
>>>>>>>>>> using them since 1982, 42 years.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Kamala herself tweeted out exchanges with her husband in 2021
>> where they
>>>>>>>>>> talked about who they were choosing in their brackets.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/yYjH5g9ogXE?t=409
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Between Biden's almost weekly made-up stories about his past and Kamala
>>>>>>>>>> gaslighting us about women's basketball, what the hell is going
>> on in the
>>>>>>>>>> White House?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Now tell the rest of the story, coward. But you won't, so I'll have to
>>>>>>>>> do it again.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Mediaite reached out to the Vice President's office for
>> clarification and
>>>>>>>>>> was told that Harris did, in fact, misspeak and that she meant to
>>>> say that
>>>>>>>>>> the use of the "March Madness" copyright was only made available to the
>>>>>>>>>> women's tournament lin 2022.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hahahahahahahahahaha!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> "Misspeak". That's politician code for "lie".
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Feel better now, Bunky? She owned up to her mistake and explained it.
>>>>>>>>> Something you or any of your Oathkeeper buddies would have the stones
>>>>>>>>> to do.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Just like you refuse to do in the UNRWA thread.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Really. You need to learn how to read.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> You don't seem to mind outright lying and felony convictions, but if
>>>>>>> someone owns up to a mistake, you can't abide that.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> A women's basketball gaffe? This is what you call scraping the bottom
>>>>>> of the barrel for some "gotcha" moment.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Everyone know being wrong about college basketball is the same as rape,
>>>>> fraud, election interference, witness tampering, insurrection, stealing
>>>>> classified documents, obstruction of justice etc.
>>>>> 
>>>>> It's all equal to our resident Oathkeeper lawyer.
>>>> 
>>>> Yes I'm sure Adam H. Kerman, Esq. would agree. Even if he does need to
>>>> buff up on his copyright and trademark case law.
>>> 
>>> Still contributing STOOPID rather than actual discussion, Dear
>>> Sockpuppet.
>> 
>> That's the second time you've said that, who am I supposed to be a
>> "sockpuppet" of?
>> 
>>> Go for it. Name the aspect of either trademark or copyright law that
>>> would prevent the women's sport of intercollegiate athletics from having
>>> a system of playoffs created to meet the needs of their sport.
>> 
>> Haven't you thoroughly embarrassed yourself enough with the "it's too
>> generic a concept to be trademarked" boner? That's all I was referring
>> to.
> 
> I didn't correct the spokesflak use of "trademark" rather than
> "copyright"; that was BTR1701.

I quoted you exactly, quit blaming him.

> You're still ducking the question. Clearly you cannot answer because you
> are ignorant as fuck.

No pal it's you who's ignorant as fuck because you claimed "college 
women's basketball['s] playoff structure....[is] too generic a concept 
to be trademarked" and moviepig gave you a cite that proved you were 
clearly wrong.

Don't get mad at me because you screwed up with some generic claim that 
was easily disproved.

>  I still want to know why you believe that women's
> college basketball couldn't have "playoff brackets" till they had
> permission from the trademark holder.

Is that what you still want to know? Well that's not the issue at hand 
and nothing I ever put forth. Go argue with someone who said that. 
<sheesh>