Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: The error of the halting problem
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 08:29:10 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <v3mj8m$303qa$4@i2pn2.org>
References: <v3lafd$1uml$1@dont-email.me> <v3loms$2uv04$1@i2pn2.org>
	<v3lou5$43oa$1@dont-email.me> <v3lrh1$2uv03$1@i2pn2.org>
	<v3lrvi$4h2j$2@dont-email.me> <v3lsd0$2uv04$16@i2pn2.org>
	<v3ltaa$8gjv$2@dont-email.me> <v3lu07$2uv03$3@i2pn2.org>
	<v3lubr$8kuk$1@dont-email.me> <v3lv87$2uv03$5@i2pn2.org>
	<v3lvru$8r46$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 08:29:10 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3149642"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2919
Lines: 40

Am Mon, 03 Jun 2024 21:58:06 -0500 schrieb olcott:
> On 6/3/2024 9:47 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 6/3/24 10:32 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 6/3/2024 9:26 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 6/3/24 10:14 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 6/3/2024 8:58 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/3/24 9:51 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When H is asked a yes/no question where both answers are
>>>>>>> contradicted by its input *IT IS A FREAKING RIGGED GAME*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But both answers aren't wrong. Remember, the question is built to
>>>>>> make a SPECIFIC decider wrong, and by its algorithm, it will give a
>>>>>> SPECIFIC answer to each SPECIFIC question.
>>>>>>
>>>>> You can't get away with that head game by pretending to not
>>>>> understand what infinite an set of H/D pairs is.
>>>>
>>>> But it doesn't matter.
>>>>
>>> It matters enormously. Once we fully understand that the limits of
>>> computation were always a ruse then we can give computation the
>>> priority that it truly deserves. It might be the life on earth is
>>> killed off because we did not build a semantic lie detector quickly
>>> enough.
>> 
>> But you are working on it wrong, because you just don't understand the
>> actual nature of truth.
> 
> Every expression X that is true on the basis of its meaning can be
> proven untrue by a lack of a connection to the meaning that makes it
> true. *You have understood this better than anyone else*
No. "true expressions can be proven untrue"? There are true but unprovable
sentences (see Gödel). 

> When D is defined to contradict both values that H returns then D is not
> a truth bearer in H in the same way that the Liar Paradox "This sentence
> is not true" is not a truth bearer in English.

-- 
joes