Article <v3pqlt$1003g$2@dont-email.me>

Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v3pqlt$1003g$2@dont-email.me>

Deutsch English Français Italiano

<v3pqlt$1003g$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 08:54:05 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <v3pqlt$1003g$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v3o2dj$jm9q$1@dont-email.me> <v3p62t$sg73$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2024 15:54:05 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="dbcb5a2e000d59c1dda264f94a647a93";
	logging-data="1048688"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18vbEnP/zfpATbl5sse6Bj0"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2DngliedBbyr9Q//YhP4DyKW4G4=
In-Reply-To: <v3p62t$sg73$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2476

On 6/5/2024 3:02 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
> Op 04.jun.2024 om 23:53 schreef olcott:
>> https://liarparadox.org/DD_correctly_simulated_by_HH_is_Proven.pdf
>>
>> At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact that the above
>> link conclusively proves that DD <is> correctly simulated by HH.
>>
>> It has been just like I smash a Boston cream pie in their face and they
>> persistently deny that there ever was any pie as this pie drips from
>> their face.
>>
>>
> 
> By changing definitions you can prove many things.
> 

int sum(int x, int y) { return x + y; }
sum(3,4) cannot correctly return the sum of 5 + 6.

H(D,D) cannot possibly return the halt status of D(D) because
D calls H in recursive simulation thus forcing the behavior of
D correctly simulated by H to be different than the behavior of
the directly executed D(D).

Requiring H(D,D) to return the halt status of D(D) is exactly
the same as requiring sum(3,4) to return the sum of 5 + 6.

*This unequivocally proves the behavior of DD correctly simulated by HH*
https://liarparadox.org/DD_correctly_simulated_by_HH_is_Proven.pdf

No one has ever shown otherwise all that anyone has ever provided
is dogmatic assertions entirely bereft of any supporting reasoning.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer