Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v3pr07$645$1@reader1.panix.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.spitfire.i.gajendra.net!not-for-mail From: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: C23 thoughts and opinions Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 13:59:35 -0000 (UTC) Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC Message-ID: <v3pr07$645$1@reader1.panix.com> References: <v2l828$18v7f$1@dont-email.me> <3uq7O.9130$nd%8.1870@fx45.iad> <v3p3aj$s5n4$3@dont-email.me> <WNZ7O.9283$nd%8.1502@fx45.iad> Injection-Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 13:59:35 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="spitfire.i.gajendra.net:166.84.136.80"; logging-data="6277"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Originator: cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) Bytes: 1429 Lines: 19 In article <WNZ7O.9283$nd%8.1502@fx45.iad>, Scott Lurndal <slp53@pacbell.net> wrote: >Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes: >>On Mon, 03 Jun 2024 21:22:07 GMT, Scott Lurndal wrote: >> >>> At the time, in the OS research community, Chorus was, indeed >>> well-known. >> >>As soon as you hear “microkernel”, you know it’s essentially a museum- >>piece now. > >You're really a piece of work. > >A modern hypervisor can be considered a microkernel. I don't understand why people still engage with this clown. Lawrence is obviously a troll. - Dan C.