Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v3rbaj$1bg3t$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic Subject: Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 22:44:19 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 88 Message-ID: <v3rbaj$1bg3t$1@dont-email.me> References: <v3o2dj$jm9q$1@dont-email.me> <v3og6b$328ec$10@i2pn2.org> <v3ogh9$pi6u$1@dont-email.me> <v3oi5t$328ec$13@i2pn2.org> <v3oifv$psat$1@dont-email.me> <v3ojg2$328eb$1@i2pn2.org> <v3ok3p$q2fh$1@dont-email.me> <v3ol8s$328ec$14@i2pn2.org> <v3olkf$q9du$1@dont-email.me> <v3piaa$33gmb$1@i2pn2.org> <v3plp1$v133$2@dont-email.me> <v3qsi6$354ia$1@i2pn2.org> <v3r1pl$16gjs$1@dont-email.me> <v3r24v$354i9$4@i2pn2.org> <v3r2pb$16lke$1@dont-email.me> <v3r39a$354ia$5@i2pn2.org> <v3r3hd$1ahl1$1@dont-email.me> <v3r6mt$354i9$6@i2pn2.org> <v3r7p2$1b63v$1@dont-email.me> <v3r914$354i9$7@i2pn2.org> <v3r9ds$1b96e$1@dont-email.me> <v3rb52$354ia$7@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2024 05:44:20 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4cb2a3366a4bdb85a28904f6e3988fec"; logging-data="1425533"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+8z7XcQtIdqrAUCiAPLmEe" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:bDZSqf0CWd70EDHzEFAuRTwk9ww= In-Reply-To: <v3rb52$354ia$7@i2pn2.org> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 5075 On 6/5/2024 10:41 PM, Richard Damon wrote: > On 6/5/24 11:11 PM, olcott wrote: >> On 6/5/2024 10:05 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>> On 6/5/24 10:43 PM, olcott wrote: >>>> On 6/5/2024 9:25 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>> On 6/5/24 9:31 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>> On 6/5/2024 8:27 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>> On 6/5/24 9:18 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>>> On 6/5/2024 8:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>>>>> Nopoe, because it is based on the LIE that a partial simulation >>>>>>>>> of a machine indicates what it will do after the simulation >>>>>>>>> stopped, and that the simulation of a DIFFERENT machine tells >>>>>>>>> you of the behavior of a different machine then simulated. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *I will dumb it down for you some more* >>>>>>>> Try any show how this DD can be correctly simulated by any HH >>>>>>>> such that this DD reaches past its machine address [00001dbe] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I never said it could, you just are stuck in a bad question. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT >>>>>> UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE >>>>>> THAT I AM INCORRECT >>>>> >>>>> Then you aren't going to get anywhere, because I just don't care >>>>> about that worthless claim. Only when you cross the line from >>>>> talking about the SUBJECTIVE answer that HH saw, to the OBJECTIVE >>>>> behavior of the machine the input represents to a Halt Decider, >>>>> will you get me caring, and slapping you down hard with a factual >>>>> rebuttal. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *I will dumb it down for you some more* >>>>>> Try any show how this DD can be correctly simulated by any HH >>>>>> such that this DD reaches past its machine address [00001dbe] >>>>> >>>>> But I don't claim that it can. I won't go to the effort to confirm >>>>> that it can't, because, frankly, I don't give a damn because it is >>>>> MEANINGLESS. >>>>> >>>> >>>> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT >>>> UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE >>>> THAT I AM INCORRECT >>> >>> But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, because I >>> am not willing to put that effort into your worthless claim. >>> >> >> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT >> UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE >> THAT I AM INCORRECT > > But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, because I am > not willing to put that effort into your worthless claim. > THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE THAT I AM INCORRECT *I will dumb it down for you some more* Try any show how this DD can be correctly simulated by any HH such that this DD reaches past its machine address [00001dbe] _DD() [00001db2] 55 push ebp [00001db3] 8bec mov ebp,esp [00001db5] 51 push ecx [00001db6] 8b4508 mov eax,[ebp+08] [00001db9] 50 push eax ; push DD [00001dba] 8b4d08 mov ecx,[ebp+08] [00001dbd] 51 push ecx ; push DD [00001dbe] e8bff5ffff call 00001382 ; call HH *Mike Terry would admit it if he would pay attention* *He is not a liar* *This unequivocally proves the behavior of DD correctly simulated by HH* https://liarparadox.org/DD_correctly_simulated_by_HH_is_Proven.pdf -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer