Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: At least 100 people kept denying the easily verified fact
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2024 23:04:39 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 98
Message-ID: <v3rcgn$1bpcn$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v3o2dj$jm9q$1@dont-email.me> <v3og6b$328ec$10@i2pn2.org>
 <v3ogh9$pi6u$1@dont-email.me> <v3oi5t$328ec$13@i2pn2.org>
 <v3oifv$psat$1@dont-email.me> <v3ojg2$328eb$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v3ok3p$q2fh$1@dont-email.me> <v3ol8s$328ec$14@i2pn2.org>
 <v3olkf$q9du$1@dont-email.me> <v3piaa$33gmb$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v3plp1$v133$2@dont-email.me> <v3qsi6$354ia$1@i2pn2.org>
 <v3r1pl$16gjs$1@dont-email.me> <v3r24v$354i9$4@i2pn2.org>
 <v3r2pb$16lke$1@dont-email.me> <v3r39a$354ia$5@i2pn2.org>
 <v3r3hd$1ahl1$1@dont-email.me> <v3r6mt$354i9$6@i2pn2.org>
 <v3r7p2$1b63v$1@dont-email.me> <v3r914$354i9$7@i2pn2.org>
 <v3r9ds$1b96e$1@dont-email.me> <v3rb52$354ia$7@i2pn2.org>
 <v3rbaj$1bg3t$1@dont-email.me> <v3rc4m$354i9$8@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2024 06:04:39 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4cb2a3366a4bdb85a28904f6e3988fec";
	logging-data="1435031"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/+CzMvc5S6/XtmwaZ8JJjT"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ta/1zGffURaJfVtRim8QvUsmRBs=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v3rc4m$354i9$8@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 5631

On 6/5/2024 10:58 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 6/5/24 11:44 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 6/5/2024 10:41 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 6/5/24 11:11 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 6/5/2024 10:05 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 6/5/24 10:43 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/5/2024 9:25 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/5/24 9:31 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/5/2024 8:27 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 6/5/24 9:18 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/5/2024 8:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Nopoe, because it is based on the LIE that a partial 
>>>>>>>>>>> simulation of a machine indicates what it will do after the 
>>>>>>>>>>> simulation stopped, and that the simulation of a DIFFERENT 
>>>>>>>>>>> machine tells you of the behavior of a different machine then 
>>>>>>>>>>> simulated.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *I will dumb it down for you some more*
>>>>>>>>>> Try any show how this DD can be correctly simulated by any HH
>>>>>>>>>> such that this DD reaches past its machine address [00001dbe]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I never said it could, you just are stuck in a bad question.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT
>>>>>>>> UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE
>>>>>>>> THAT I AM INCORRECT
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then you aren't going to get anywhere, because I just don't care 
>>>>>>> about that worthless claim. Only when you cross the line from 
>>>>>>> talking about the SUBJECTIVE answer that HH saw, to the OBJECTIVE 
>>>>>>> behavior of the machine the input represents to a Halt Decider, 
>>>>>>> will you get me caring, and slapping you down hard with a factual 
>>>>>>> rebuttal.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *I will dumb it down for you some more*
>>>>>>>> Try any show how this DD can be correctly simulated by any HH
>>>>>>>> such that this DD reaches past its machine address [00001dbe]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But I don't claim that it can. I won't go to the effort to 
>>>>>>> confirm that it can't, because, frankly, I don't give a damn 
>>>>>>> because it is MEANINGLESS.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT
>>>>>> UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE
>>>>>> THAT I AM INCORRECT
>>>>>
>>>>> But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, because I 
>>>>> am not willing to put that effort into your worthless claim.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT
>>>> UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE
>>>> THAT I AM INCORRECT
>>>
>>> But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, because I 
>>> am not willing to put that effort into your worthless claim.
>>>
>>
>> THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT
>> UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE
>> THAT I AM INCORRECT
> 
> But, as I said, I won't acknowledge that you are correct, because I am 
> not willing to put that effort into your worthless claim.
> 

THIS IS ALL THAT YOU WILL EVER GET TO TALK TO ME ABOUT
UNTIL YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I AM CORRECT OR YOU PROVE
THAT I AM INCORRECT

*I will dumb it down for you some more*
Try any show how this DD can be correctly simulated by any HH
such that this DD reaches past its machine address [00001dbe]

_DD()
[00001db2] 55 push ebp
[00001db3] 8bec mov ebp,esp
[00001db5] 51 push ecx
[00001db6] 8b4508 mov eax,[ebp+08]
[00001db9] 50 push eax ; push DD
[00001dba] 8b4d08 mov ecx,[ebp+08]
[00001dbd] 51 push ecx ; push DD
[00001dbe] e8bff5ffff call 00001382 ; call HH

*Mike Terry would admit it if he would pay attention*
*He is not a liar*

*This unequivocally proves the behavior of DD correctly simulated by HH*
https://liarparadox.org/DD_correctly_simulated_by_HH_is_Proven.pdf

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer