Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic
Subject: Re: When Richard calls people liars he lies
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 09:56:28 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 77
Message-ID: <v3sims$1hufb$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v3sh0t$1gra7$12@dont-email.me> <v3shrv$1i0ua$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2024 16:56:30 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4cb2a3366a4bdb85a28904f6e3988fec";
	logging-data="1636843"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX198L/LdhX7Q0nhh6XfR2ty5"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VtbQWUWeSddDcXKFLQ+1RPddpg4=
In-Reply-To: <v3shrv$1i0ua$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3880

On 6/6/2024 9:42 AM, Mikko wrote:
> On 2024-06-06 14:27:41 +0000, olcott said:
> 
>> The common meaning of the term [lie] is
>>
>> noun
>> (1) a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive;
>> an intentional untruth.
>>
>> verb (used without object)
>> (1) to speak falsely or utter untruth knowingly, as with
>> intent to deceive. Synonyms: fib, prevaricate
>>
>> When Richard calls people liars and does not mean they have any
>> intent to deceive this makes Richard a liar because Richard knows
>> that people will be lead to believe that he is using the common
>> definition that requires an intent to deceive.
>>
>> https://www.dictionary.com/browse/lie
> 
> In some places the subject line may be regareded aa a crime unless
> its author can present an acceptable proof of it.
> 
> It is often regarded as a bad manner to put names of people
> to the subject line.
> 
> According to Wiktionary https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/lie#Etymology_2
> a possible meaning is 'To be mistaken or unintentionally spread false
> information'.
> 

Richard intends for people to get the false impression thus Richard
lies with intent to deceive.

Richard already knows that an intent to deceive is the common definition
of lie, and deliberately calls me a liar full well knowing that I have
no intent to deceive. Two other people in this forum, already called him
out on calling me a liar.

Richard calls me a liar with full intent to short-circuit an honest
dialogue because he makes sure to utterly fail to provide any evidence
that I am even incorrect on this key point that we have been debated for
three years:

Try any show how this DD can be correctly simulated by any HH
such that this DD reaches past its machine address [00001dbe]

_DD()
[00001e12] 55         push ebp
[00001e13] 8bec       mov  ebp,esp
[00001e15] 51         push ecx
[00001e16] 8b4508     mov  eax,[ebp+08]
[00001e19] 50         push eax      ; push DD
[00001e1a] 8b4d08     mov  ecx,[ebp+08]
[00001e1d] 51         push ecx      ; push DD
[00001e1e] e85ff5ffff call 00001382 ; call HH

*Mike Terry would admit it if he would pay attention*
*He is not a liar*

*This unequivocally proves the behavior of DD correctly simulated by HH*
https://liarparadox.org/DD_correctly_simulated_by_HH_is_Proven.pdf

*My purpose in saying this is two-fold*
(1) Turn the conversation anchored in false rhetoric into
an honest dialogue anchored in verified facts.

(2) Protect Richard from the consequences of this:

Revelations 21:8 (KJV)
....all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth
with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer